Skip to content

Conversation

@boonya
Copy link
Contributor

@boonya boonya commented Nov 13, 2016

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@rmk135 rmk135 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for a delay, it looks good! :)

@boonya
Copy link
Contributor Author

boonya commented Nov 18, 2016

@rmk135 , but it doesn't work )))

@rmk135
Copy link
Member

rmk135 commented Nov 18, 2016

what? :))

On Nov 18, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Sergii [boonya] Buinytskyi [email protected] wrote:

@rmk135 https://github.com/rmk135 , but it doesn't work )))


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #34 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABqU4WVemUT1gHpYte7o1ArJ5C5Sr3qqks5q_W3bgaJpZM4Kw0Pt.

@boonya
Copy link
Contributor Author

boonya commented Nov 18, 2016

@boonya
Copy link
Contributor Author

boonya commented Nov 18, 2016

It depends on fields sequence. In this case open_id field depends on id. So, if model binds id first then it works fine. But in other case it doesn't. Still working on it when I have a time.

@boonya boonya changed the title Issue #16: Fields custom getters and setters. Issue #26: Fields custom getters and setters. Nov 18, 2016
@boonya boonya force-pushed the 26-custom_getter_setter branch from e423043 to 902333b Compare November 18, 2016 09:53
@rmk135 rmk135 self-assigned this Nov 27, 2017
@rmk135 rmk135 force-pushed the 26-custom_getter_setter branch from 902333b to fc4ce6b Compare November 28, 2017 09:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants