Skip to content

Update EIP-8062: tiny edits #10785

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
+1 −1
Open

Update EIP-8062: tiny edits #10785

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion EIPS/eip-8062.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ The gas cost accounting is as follows:

* 500 gas – cold touch of an account known to have no code (as specified in [EIP-2780](./eip-2780.md)),
* 1000 gas – one account-leaf write in the account trie (as specified in [EIP-2780](./eip-2780.md)),
* 704 gas – an [EIP-4895](./eip-4895.md) withdrawal {index:uint64, validator_index:uint64, address:bytes20, amount:uint64}, consisting of $8 + 8 + 20 + 8 = 44$ bytes, priced analogously to calldata at 16 gas/byte.
* 704 gas – an [EIP-4895](./eip-4895.md) withdrawal {index: uint64, validator_index: uint64, address: bytes20, amount: uint64}, consisting of $8 + 8 + 20 + 8 = 44$ bytes, priced analogously to calldata at 16 gas/byte.

It can be noted that we are not with this accounting charging for the CL work that `0x01` validators impose due to the sweep. We are neither charging `0x02` validators for the CL work of EL-triggered partial withdrawals via [EIP-7002](./eip-7002.md), but they are charged more extensively on the EL for triggering the withdrawal. Further note that `2048`-ETH validators are exempted in the specification from the sweep withdrawal fee, to avoid harming consolidation, and as an acknowledgement that `2048` ETH is the maximum stake that the protocol currently is designed to handle.

Expand Down
Loading