[Pixel998]

Prerequisites checklist

• I have read the contributing guidelines.

AI acknowledgment

Check all that apply.

• I did not use AI to generate this PR.
• I used AI to write or edit the description of this PR (including translation).
• I used AI to understand the codebase.
• I used AI to write or edit the files in this PR and I reviewed the files.

What did you do?

/* eslint css/prefer-logical-properties: "error" */

a {
	margin-left: 10px;
}

What did you expect to happen?

An error on margin-left only, the part that the message names and the suggestion replaces.

What actually happened?

The error covered the whole declaration.

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This PR makes prefer-logical-properties report physical properties at the property name instead of across the whole declaration.

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

Ended the property report's location at the property name instead of using the Declaration node's location.

Related Issues

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Diagnostics for non-logical CSS properties now highlight only the property name, making the reported location more precise.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.

Recent review info

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: Central YAML; Path: .coderabbit.yaml
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 4b2ee69e-da0f-4c63-b2af-1419c52802e8

Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 79e7d51 and 4daef2a.

Files selected for processing: 2

• src/rules/prefer-logical-properties.js
• tests/rules/prefer-logical-properties.test.js

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 0 remain after this review.

Walkthrough

The prefer-logical-properties rule now reports non-logical properties on the property name only. Tests update expected end columns to match the shorter diagnostic range.

Changes: Logical Property Diagnostic

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Property-name diagnostic range src/rules/prefer-logical-properties.js, tests/rules/prefer-logical-properties.test.js	The diagnostic range now covers only the property name. Tests update expected end columns for margin-top, MARGIN-TOP, and padding-top.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~8 minutes

Change: Bug fix

Suggested labels: bug

Suggested reviewers: azat-io

Merge Risk: Minimal · up to 4daef

The change highlights the property name rather than the whole declaration, with matching test expectations. No actionable merge-blocking risk was identified; merge after normal checks pass.

Pre-merge checks: 5

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check		Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check		The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: reporting the property name location in the prefer-logical-properties rule.
Docstring Coverage		No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentat…
Linked Issues check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentation-only edits and deletions within surviving functions are included; unchanged diff context and fully deleted functions are excluded. Analyzed 0 functions across 2 files.

Finishing Touches

Generate docstrings

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

[DMartens]

Changes LGTM, thanks. Leaving open for others to review.