Skip to content

Clarify event style usage #636

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

moose-code
Copy link
Contributor

@moose-code moose-code commented May 20, 2025

Summary

  • update configuration file docs to note not mixing event styles
  • mention this restriction in config JSON schema

Testing

  • yarn build (fails: package missing)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a note to the configuration guide clarifying that only one style of event definition (either ABI event names or human-readable signatures) should be used per contract to avoid errors.
    • Updated schema documentation to reinforce the requirement of using a consistent event definition style.

Copy link

vercel bot commented May 20, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
envio-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 20, 2025 11:17am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 20, 2025

Walkthrough

A clarification was added to both the configuration guide and the event schema description regarding event definition styles. Users are now explicitly instructed to use either human-readable event signatures or ABI event names consistently within a contract configuration, and warned against mixing both styles to prevent errors.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
docs/HyperIndex/Guides/configuration-file.mdx Added an important note in the "Events Selection" section clarifying that only one style of event definition should be used per contract.
static/schemas/config.evm.json Updated the "event" property description in the "EventConfig" schema to instruct consistent use of event definition styles and warn against mixing them.

Poem

In the warren of configs, a rule now appears,
Choose one event style, to avoid future tears.
Signatures or names—just pick and commit,
Mixing them up? The code won’t permit!
So hop down the path, with clarity in view,
This rabbit reminds: one style will do! 🐇✨

Note

⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf

CodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback.
Learn more here.


Note

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching

CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@moose-code
Copy link
Contributor Author

closes #355

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
static/schemas/config.evm.json (1)

153-155: Align style and improve readability in schema description.

Consider updating the description text to:

  • Use "human-readable" with a hyphen
  • Capitalize "JSON" instead of "json"
  • Use the standard "e.g.," abbreviation instead of "eg."
  • Replace the dash before "do not mix" with a semicolon for clarity

For example:

- "description": "The human readable signature of an event 'eg. Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 value)' OR a reference to the name of an event in a json ABI file defined in your contract config. A provided signature will take precedence over what is defined in the json ABI. Use either signatures or ABI event names consistently - do not mix both styles.",
+ "description": "The human-readable signature of an event (e.g., Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 value)) or a reference to the name of an event in a JSON ABI file defined in your contract config. A provided signature takes precedence over what is defined in the JSON ABI; use either human-readable signatures or ABI event names consistently; do not mix both styles.",
docs/HyperIndex/Guides/configuration-file.mdx (1)

98-102: Refine wording for clarity and consistency in the docs.

To improve flow and align with the schema description, consider:

:::important
Choose **one** event definition style. Use either event names from an ABI file or human-readable event signatures. Do not mix both styles within the same contract, as this is unsupported and can cause errors.
:::
  • Merges broken lines for readability
  • Matches phrasing with the JSON schema ("event names from an ABI file")
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 59c9bf3 and bc37a2d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/HyperIndex/Guides/configuration-file.mdx (1 hunks)
  • static/schemas/config.evm.json (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +98 to +102
:::important
Choose **one** event definition style. Use either names from an ABI file *or*
human&#x2011;readable event signatures. Mixing both in the same contract isn&#x2019;t
supported and can cause errors.
:::
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's supported though 🤔

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants