Skip to content

Conversation

kintrix007
Copy link

Closes #33

Maybe it would be worth discussing the exact API to publish.

I personally think it is fine to add a function like stringAs : Decoder a -> Decoder a to the public API, I can see how it is rare to want to decode the string as anything but an integer or a float.

Because of that it might be a better idea to expose functions stringAsInt : Decoder Int and stringAsFloat : Decoder Float instead. Maybe alongside a generic stringAs, to support weird use-cases?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add function to parse JSON string as a number instead. ("42" -> 42)
1 participant