Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Remove plugins, i.e. move to community plugins repo #2124

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

lalalune
Copy link
Member

Currently all of our plugins are kept in the main monorepo, but this is causing extreme dependency bloat.

We have a new repo here, which has all of the plugins:
https://github.com/elizaOS/community-plugins

This PR removes the plugins. Since the history is shared, we should be able to retarget plugin PRs to that repo.

@lalalune lalalune changed the title Remove plugins, i.e. move to community plugins repo feat: Remove plugins, i.e. move to community plugins repo Jan 10, 2025
@tomguluson92
Copy link
Contributor

Ok, I just commit a new PR about plugin with TTS a few hours ago. Definitely support this move, A lite and concise core runtime is cool.

@shakkernerd shakkernerd marked this pull request as draft January 10, 2025 17:33
@odilitime
Copy link
Collaborator

Can we add some categorization around whether it's a service versus a plugin that any one can use without any API keys. Maybe even separate our partner plugins from the community ones.

@dev-cz
Copy link

dev-cz commented Jan 10, 2025

Agree with @odilitime . Also extending that, like maybe its free with limited usage, but API key is paid, so like a Freemium tag or something as well.

I also think having some sort of commitment of support for X time, for it to be approved to merge in, because many plugins are created and the creator is gone, so further adds broken, plugins because than others create their own version.

@wtfsayo wtfsayo mentioned this pull request Jan 15, 2025
@jmikedupont2
Copy link

also some plugins like solana chime in on evaluations even if they are not activated it seemed in the past, so we also want to be able to prevent them from accidentally being activated.

@odilitime
Copy link
Collaborator

superseded by #3339

@odilitime odilitime closed this Feb 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants