[8.16](backport #6710) Redacted nested secrets path value #6739
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Redact secrets within complex nested paths. (cherry picked from commit 647b43b)
mergify
bot
requested review from
michel-laterman and
pkoutsovasilis
and removed request for
a team
|
jlind23
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Redact secrets within complex nested paths.
Why is it important?
some secrets are getting skipped within diagnostics bundles
Checklist
I have made corresponding changes to the documentationI have made corresponding change to the default configuration files./changelog/fragmentsusing the changelog toolI have added an integration test or an E2E testDisruptive User Impact
None
This is an automatic backport of pull request #6710 done by Mergify.