Skip to content

Conversation

charlotte-hoblik
Copy link
Contributor

This PR updates an example to use the match query instead of the semantic query.
Connected to: https://github.com/elastic/developer-docs-team/issues/321

@charlotte-hoblik charlotte-hoblik self-assigned this Oct 20, 2025
@charlotte-hoblik charlotte-hoblik added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Oct 20, 2025
@charlotte-hoblik charlotte-hoblik requested a review from a team as a code owner October 20, 2025 13:13
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 20, 2025

🔍 Preview links for changed docs

Copy link
Contributor

@leemthompo leemthompo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, as we discussed earlier we should also provide a simpler workflow in follow up work, because the download sample tsv and reindexing steps are quite heavy.

Ideally at least the simple version would be all copy/paste API calls.

Copy link
Member

@kderusso kderusso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with one piece of feedback

"query": "What causes muscle soreness after running?" <2>
"match": {
"content": {
"query": "What causes muscle soreness after running?" <1>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we're removing the first footnote that we're querying on the semantic text field, I don't think this footnote adds a lot of value.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

++ I'd maintain both FWIW

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants