Update dependency esbuild from 0.19.7 to 0.19.8

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
esbuild	0.19.7 -> 0.19.8

---

Release Notes

evanw/esbuild (esbuild)

v0.19.8

Compare Source

• Add a treemap chart to esbuild's bundle analyzer (#​2848)

  The bundler analyzer on esbuild's website (https://esbuild.github.io/analyze/) now has a treemap chart type in addition to the two existing chart types (sunburst and flame). This should be more familiar for people coming from other similar tools, as well as make better use of large screens.

• Allow decorators after the export keyword (#​104)

  Previously esbuild's decorator parser followed the original behavior of TypeScript's experimental decorators feature, which only allowed decorators to come before the export keyword. However, the upcoming JavaScript decorators feature also allows decorators to come after the export keyword. And with TypeScript 5.0, TypeScript now also allows experimental decorators to come after the export keyword too. So esbuild now allows this as well:

  // This old syntax has always been permitted:
  @​decorator export class Foo {}
  @​decorator export default class Foo {}
  
  // This new syntax is now permitted too:
  export @​decorator class Foo {}
  export default @​decorator class Foo {}

  In addition, esbuild's decorator parser has been rewritten to fix several subtle and likely unimportant edge cases with esbuild's parsing of exports and decorators in TypeScript (e.g. TypeScript apparently does automatic semicolon insertion after interface and export interface but not after export default interface).

• Pretty-print decorators using the same whitespace as the original

  When printing code containing decorators, esbuild will now try to respect whether the original code contained newlines after the decorator or not. This can make generated code containing many decorators much more compact to read:

  // Original code
  class Foo {
    @​a @​b @​c abc
    @​x @​y @​z xyz
  }
  
  // Old output
  class Foo {
    @​a
    @​b
    @​c
    abc;
    @​x
    @​y
    @​z
    xyz;
  }
  
  // New output
  class Foo {
    @​a @​b @​c abc;
    @​x @​y @​z xyz;
  }

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

[renovate]

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@f0a62e0). Click here to learn what that means.

❗ Current head e517bc0 differs from pull request most recent head 3ac11a7. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3ac11a7 to get more accurate results

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             master      #785   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage          ?   100.00%           
==========================================
  Files             ?        32           
  Lines             ?      1097           
  Branches          ?       133           
==========================================
  Hits              ?      1097           
  Misses            ?         0           
  Partials          ?         0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.