Skip to content

Security: dbsectrainer/nist_800_53_scanner

Security

SECURITY.md

Security Policy for NIST 800-53 Scanner

πŸ›‘ Our Commitment to Security

The NIST 800-53 Scanner project is dedicated to maintaining the highest standards of security. We take the security of our project seriously and appreciate the responsible disclosure of any potential vulnerabilities.

🚨 Reporting Security Vulnerabilities

Responsible Disclosure Process

  1. Do Not Publicly Disclose

    • Do NOT open public GitHub issues for security vulnerabilities
    • Avoid discussing potential vulnerabilities in public forums
  2. Confidential Reporting

  3. What to Include in Your Report

    • Detailed description of the vulnerability
    • Potential impact and severity
    • Steps to reproduce
    • Proposed mitigation or fix (if available)

πŸ” Vulnerability Handling Process

Acknowledgment and Investigation

  1. We will acknowledge receipt of your vulnerability report within 24 hours
  2. Our security team will investigate and validate the report
  3. We aim to provide an initial assessment within 72 hours

Vulnerability Classification

  • Critical: Immediate threat, potential system compromise
  • High: Significant security risk
  • Medium: Potential security weakness
  • Low: Minor security concern

Resolution Timeline

  • Critical: Addressed within 24-48 hours
  • High: Resolved within 5-7 business days
  • Medium: Addressed within 14 days
  • Low: Resolved in next scheduled update

πŸ›‘οΈ Security Best Practices

For Researchers and Reporters

  • Use encrypted communication
  • Provide clear, reproducible steps
  • Do not attempt to exploit the vulnerability
  • Maintain confidentiality

For Project Contributors

  • Implement secure coding practices
  • Conduct regular security audits
  • Use static and dynamic code analysis
  • Keep dependencies updated

οΏ½ Our Security Commitment

Ongoing Security Measures

  • Regular vulnerability scanning
  • Dependency security monitoring
  • Continuous integration security checks
  • Third-party security assessments

Security Review Process

  • Quarterly comprehensive security reviews
  • Automated and manual vulnerability assessments
  • External security audits

🀝 Safe Harbor

We offer safe harbor for security researchers who:

  • Act in good faith
  • Provide detailed, responsible disclosure
  • Do not maliciously exploit or damage our systems

πŸ”‘ PGP Public Key

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
[Your PGP Public Key Here]
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

πŸ“‹ Scope of Security Policy

Covered Components

  • Source code
  • Dependency management
  • Build and deployment processes
  • Documentation and configuration

Exclusions

  • Third-party libraries with their own security policies
  • Experimental or example code not intended for production

🌐 Compliance Frameworks

Our security practices align with:

  • NIST 800-53
  • ISO 27001
  • OWASP Security Guidelines
  • CIS Critical Security Controls

πŸ“ Policy Updates

  • Last Updated: {{ current_date }}
  • Version: 1.1.0
  • Next Review: {{ review_date }}

πŸ† Hall of Thanks

We gratefully acknowledge security researchers who help us improve our project's security.

Recent Contributors

  • [Researcher Name] - Vulnerability Type
  • [Researcher Name] - Vulnerability Type

πŸ“¬ Contact Information

Security Team Email: security@nist-scanner.org PGP Fingerprint: [Your PGP Key Fingerprint]

Approved By: Project Security Committee

There aren't any published security advisories