multi app token workflow (started from allow to create clients with different dapr-api-token )

[filintod]

Description

Allow to create clients with different dapr-api-tokens in the same process

Issue reference

We strive to have all PR being opened based on an issue, where the problem or feature have been discussed prior to implementation.

Please reference the issue this PR will close: #[issue number]

Checklist

Please make sure you've completed the relevant tasks for this PR, out of the following list:

• Code compiles correctly
• Created/updated tests
• Extended the documentation

[acroca]

Also add more information in the PR description 🙏

[acroca]

Why don't set api_token to default to settings.DAPR_API_TOKEN, and use it throughout this init function?

Suggested change

	self._api_token = api_token
	api_token = api_token if api_token is not None else settings.DAPR_API_TOKEN

[filintod]

sure, makes sense, I'll make changes in a commit as it covers more than just this line

[acroca]

Does this need to go to _api_token? Can't we just use api_token directly? I don't think it's used outside of this function

[filintod]

the underscore prefix usually hints to tell people that the variable is internal (kind of private and tell people to not used outside, not part of the external api, even though anything in python is usually accessible if you want to) more than anything. like _logger there

[acroca]

But the _logger is used in other places, the api_token doesn't leave this function.

[filintod]

I see what you mean, like why make is it part of the instance of the object. true, let me check

[filintod]

@acroca please take another look

[acroca]

The validations have failed, please fix them 🙏

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 98.19277% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 87.61%. Comparing base (bffb749) to head (ebcdf1b).
⚠️ Report is 43 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...pr-ext-workflow/tests/test_multi_token_workflow.py	96.00%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #856      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.63%   87.61%   +0.98%     
==========================================
  Files          84       94      +10     
  Lines        4473     6289    +1816     
==========================================
+ Hits         3875     5510    +1635     
- Misses        598      779     +181     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.