Skip to content

Conversation

grom72
Copy link
Contributor

@grom72 grom72 commented Jun 16, 2025

SRE-2772 ci: get rid of link to any Intel specific services/addresses like Jenkins or artifactory or emails
Instead, use an HPE address

@grom72 grom72 changed the title SRE-2772 ci: get rid of intel reference SRE-2772 ci: get rid of Intel reference Jun 16, 2025
@daosbuild3
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage provisionNodes on EL 9 with master Repo completed with status FAILURE. https://jenkins-3.daos.hpc.amslabs.hpecorp.net/job/daos-stack/job/pipeline-lib/job/PR-471/1/display/redirect

@daosbuild3
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage provisionNodes on EL 8 with slurm completed with status FAILURE. https://jenkins-3.daos.hpc.amslabs.hpecorp.net/job/daos-stack/job/pipeline-lib/job/PR-471/1/display/redirect

@daosbuild3
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage provisionNodes on Leap 15 with slurm completed with status FAILURE. https://jenkins-3.daos.hpc.amslabs.hpecorp.net/job/daos-stack/job/pipeline-lib/job/PR-471/1/display/redirect

@daosbuild3
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage provisionNodes on EL 9 with master Repo completed with status FAILURE. https://jenkins-3.daos.hpc.amslabs.hpecorp.net/job/daos-stack/job/pipeline-lib/job/PR-471/2/display/redirect

@daosbuild3
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage provisionNodes on EL 8 with slurm completed with status FAILURE. https://jenkins-3.daos.hpc.amslabs.hpecorp.net/job/daos-stack/job/pipeline-lib/job/PR-471/2/display/redirect

@daosbuild3
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage provisionNodes on Leap 15 with slurm completed with status FAILURE. https://jenkins-3.daos.hpc.amslabs.hpecorp.net/job/daos-stack/job/pipeline-lib/job/PR-471/2/display/redirect

grom72 added 3 commits July 24, 2025 12:59
Get rid of the tight connection to the hpdd.intel.com artifactory.
Instead, use an HPE address

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Gromadzki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Gromadzki <[email protected]>
@osalyk osalyk force-pushed the grom72/sre-2772-get-rid-of-intel-reference branch from 0fcb789 to 76ca25e Compare July 24, 2025 11:00
@osalyk osalyk marked this pull request as ready for review July 24, 2025 11:40
Copy link
Collaborator

@JohnMalmberg JohnMalmberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we will want to refactor this in the future to make it more neutral and disable some features of the build if the site specific repos are not known.

Nothing should be using provisionNodesV1 any more.

The e-mails that got sent in error were due to a couple of bugs in Jenkins that should be fixed now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants