Skip to content

[expr.add] Simplify phrasing around ptrdiff_t and avoid redundancy #8569

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[expr.add] Simplify phrasing around ptrdiff_t and avoid redundancy #8569

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer commented Nov 29, 2025

Fixes #8564

@jensmaurer jensmaurer requested a review from eisenwave November 29, 2025 10:03
eisenwave
eisenwave approved these changes Nov 29, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@eisenwave eisenwave left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure why we're not just adjusting #8565, but this solution seems fine too.

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

jensmaurer commented Nov 29, 2025

Sorry, I overlooked the other pull request before doing mine :-(

@eisenwave eisenwave added the P3-Other Triaged issue not in P1 or P2 label Nov 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@eisenwave eisenwave eisenwave approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@tkoeppe tkoeppe

Labels

P3-Other Triaged issue not in P1 or P2

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[expr.add] Harmonize wording for pointer subtraction/std::ptrdiff_t with [expr.sizeof]

3 participants

@jensmaurer @eisenwave @tkoeppe