Skip to content

Conversation

@diegolakatos
Copy link

@diegolakatos diegolakatos commented Dec 28, 2025

Fix a simple typing mistake

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Fixed a typo in the README example documentation.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Fix a simple typing mistake

Signed-off-by: Diego Veríssimo Lakatos <[email protected]>
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 28, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A single typo in the README.md documentation was corrected in the Lookup function example section, changing "equiualent" to "equivalent". No functional or behavioral changes introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation
README.md
Fixed typo: "equiualent" → "equivalent" in Lookup function example

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

Poem

🐰 A typo hid where words did play,
But eagle eyes found it today,
"Equiualent" now shines so true—
"Equivalent" is what we'll do! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Fix typo on README.md' directly and clearly summarizes the main change: correcting a typo ('equiualent' to 'equivalent') in the README.md file.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9cc6af5 and 0e4f8ba.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

162-162: LGTM!

Good catch on the typo fix. The corrected spelling of "equivalent" improves the documentation clarity.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @diegolakatos, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a minor but important documentation issue by correcting a typo in the README.md file. The change ensures that the project's instructions and explanations are grammatically correct and professional, enhancing readability for users and contributors.

Highlights

  • Documentation Correction: Corrected a spelling error in the README.md file, changing "equiualent" to "equivalent" for improved accuracy.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request fixes a typo in the README.md file. The change is correct and improves the readability of the documentation. I have no further comments.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant