Skip to content

Add Etherscan configuration for new networks #240

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 12, 2025
Merged

Add Etherscan configuration for new networks #240

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
c6bac3f
Add multiple networks
m-lord-renkse Apr 8, 2025
bc6649b
bump package version
m-lord-renkse Apr 8, 2025
fbf39d1
Add Etherscan configuration for new networks
fedgiac May 9, 2025
dc843d3
Merge branch 'main' into updated-block-explorer-configs-for-new-networks
fedgiac May 12, 2025
b09052b
Revert incorrect version bump from automatic merge
fedgiac May 12, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions hardhat.config.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -187,11 +187,17 @@ export default {
currency: "USD",
gasPrice: 21,
},
sourcify: {
enabled: true,
},
etherscan: {
apiKey: {
sepolia: ETHERSCAN_API_KEY,
arbitrumOne: ETHERSCAN_API_KEY,
base: ETHERSCAN_API_KEY,
optimisticEthereum: ETHERSCAN_API_KEY,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought for now avalanche and polygon

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#239 also deployed the other two, so I verified those as well.

polygon: ETHERSCAN_API_KEY,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did this work for you using the same key as other chains??
I tried deploying today with Etherscan API Key (on another project) and it didn't work.
I created a new key specifically for polygonscan.com and then it did.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, you need to create an API key per block explorer.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is luckily going to change soon, see foundry-rs/foundry#9196.

avalanche: ETHERSCAN_API_KEY,
},
customChains: [
{
Expand All @@ -202,6 +208,14 @@ export default {
browserURL: "https://basescan.org",
},
},
{
network: "avalanche",
chainId: 43114,
urls: {
apiURL: "https://api.snowscan.xyz/api",
browserURL: "https://snowscan.xyz",
},
},
],
},
};
Loading