-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 305
fix: update adr-001-node-key-refactoring.md #1103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughA typographical error in the documentation was corrected, changing "orphanes" to "orphans" in a sentence describing a method for obtaining orphaned nodes. No code, logic, or control flow was affected. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/architecture/adr-001-node-key-refactoring.md (1)
82-82
: Typo fix approved; suggest grammatical refinement
The correction from “orphanes” to “orphans” is spot on. For clarity and correct tense, consider rephrasing “which remove” to “that are removed” and tightening the sentence.Suggested diff:
- Here we are introducing a new way how to get orphaned nodes which remove in the `n+1`th version updates without storing orphans in the storage. + Here we are introducing a new way to obtain orphaned nodes that are removed in the `n+1`th version update without storing them in storage.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~82-~82: This verb may not be in the correct tense. Consider changing the tense to fit the context better.
Context: ...new way how to get orphaned nodes which remove in then+1
th version updates without ...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_TENSE)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/architecture/adr-001-node-key-refactoring.md
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/architecture/adr-001-node-key-refactoring.md
[uncategorized] ~82-~82: This verb may not be in the correct tense. Consider changing the tense to fit the context better.
Context: ...new way how to get orphaned nodes which remove in the n+1
th version updates without ...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_TENSE)
Description:
This pull request updates the documentation in adr-001-node-key-refactoring.md to clarify the process of handling orphaned nodes during version updates. The change improves the explanation of how orphan nodes are removed in the n+1-th version update without storing orphans in the storage. This helps make the pruning strategy and migration steps more understandable and precise. No code changes are included; this is a documentation improvement only.
Summary by CodeRabbit