Skip to content

update containerd version to 2.1.0 #4217

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 9, 2025

Conversation

Shubhranshu153
Copy link
Contributor

Upgrading containerd version to 2.1.0

@Shubhranshu153 Shubhranshu153 force-pushed the upgrage-containerd-2.1 branch 3 times, most recently from 52ee64d to e427203 Compare May 8, 2025 15:25
@@ -31,5 +31,5 @@ var (
BusyboxImage = "ghcr.io/containerd/busybox:1.36"
AlpineImage = mirrorOf("alpine:3.13")
NginxAlpineImage = mirrorOf("nginx:1.19-alpine")
GolangImage = mirrorOf("golang:1.18")
GolangImage = mirrorOf("golang:1.23")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heads-up @Shubhranshu153 .
See https://github.com/containerd/nerdctl/blob/main/docs/multi-platform.md#macos--lima
Tread carefully with this.
Unfortunately, the mirrored images we are using are not multiplatform.
Since this specifically is for Darwin (which is not using it, actually), we are fine, but the same change in _linux would break hell loose on arm.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks. But in that case the test would fail using that image right or do we expect some unrecoverable issue?

Copy link
Contributor

@apostasie apostasie May 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any test involving building with that image would hard fail.
@AkihiroSuda got bitten by this: #4215

(though again that would be if you change it for linux as well, which you are not doing here)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is already set for all platform here #4215

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you rebase and revert this line, then LGTM

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reverted this change and rebased

@apostasie
Copy link
Contributor

apostasie commented May 8, 2025

Linking failures:

@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda added this to the v2.1.0 milestone May 9, 2025
Signed-off-by: Shubharanshu Mahapatra <[email protected]>
@Shubhranshu153 Shubhranshu153 force-pushed the upgrage-containerd-2.1 branch from e427203 to 8b85431 Compare May 9, 2025 02:39
Copy link
Member

@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda merged commit e556a92 into containerd:main May 9, 2025
56 of 57 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants