chore(deps): Update ubi-minimal base image

[st3penta]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 4f39b812-dbfa-4d9e-9521-4b86287fbe71

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[fullsend-ai-review]

🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 10:32 AM UTC · Completed 10:40 AM UTC

Commit: 87c4a29 · View workflow run →

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

Flag	Coverage Δ
generative	69.55% <ø> (ø)
integration	69.55% <ø> (ø)
unit	69.55% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[fullsend-ai-review]

Review

Findings

High

• [protected-path] Dockerfile, Dockerfile.dist — Both Dockerfiles are under protected paths and require human approval. The PR has no linked issue and no description explaining the rationale for modifying these governance/infrastructure files.
  Remediation: Add a linked issue or PR description explaining the base image update, or obtain human approval for the protected-path change.

---

Next steps:

• /fs-fix — agent addresses review findings automatically
• /fs-fix <your instruction> — agent fixes with your specific guidance
• Push commits directly — review re-runs automatically on push
• /fs-fix-stop — disable automatic fix runs for this PR

Previous run

Review

Findings

High

• [protected-path] Dockerfile, Dockerfile.dist — This PR modifies protected files (Dockerfile, Dockerfile.dist) that require human approval. The PR has no linked issue and no description explaining why these governance/infrastructure files are being changed.
  Remediation: Add a PR description explaining the base image update rationale, or link to a tracking issue that authorizes this change.

---

Labels: PR modifies Dockerfiles and updates base image dependency

---

Next steps:

• /fs-fix — agent addresses review findings automatically
• /fs-fix <your instruction> — agent fixes with your specific guidance
• Push commits directly — review re-runs automatically on push
• /fs-fix-stop — disable automatic fix runs for this PR

[fullsend-ai-review]

🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 1:26 PM UTC · Completed 1:34 PM UTC

Commit: 87c4a29 · View workflow run →

[fullsend-ai-review]

See the review comment for full details.

[fullsend-ai-retro]

🤖 Finished Retro · ✅ Success · Started 4:19 PM UTC · Completed 4:34 PM UTC

Commit: 87c4a29 · View workflow run →

[fullsend-ai-retro]

Retro: PR #3494 — chore(deps): Update ubi-minimal base image

PR type: Human-authored 2-line Docker base image digest bump (Dockerfile + Dockerfile.dist) targeting release-v0.7.

Timeline

1. Aug 13 10:31 — PR opened by st3penta. No description, no linked issue.
2. Aug 13 10:31–10:40 — First review run (31691447104): CHANGES_REQUESTED due to [protected-path] finding on Dockerfile/Dockerfile.dist. Cost: $2.04, 25 turns (Opus). PRIOR_REVIEW_PROVENANCE=none.
3. Aug 13 21:39 — Human reviewer (simonbaird) catches that rpms.lock.yaml includes source RPMs that should be removed for consistency with release-v0.8 and main branches. The review agent did not flag this.
4. Aug 14 13:24 — Author pushes fix addressing human feedback (removes source RPMs).
5. Aug 14 13:25–13:34 — Second review run (31804616899): Same [protected-path] finding, CHANGES_REQUESTED again. Cost: $2.05, 27 turns (Opus). PRIOR_REVIEW_PROVENANCE=none — prior review not found.
6. Aug 14 16:18 — simonbaird approves and merges, overriding the agent's change request.

Assessment

The review agent added no value on this PR. Its only finding ([protected-path]) was a governance gate that a human overrode at merge time. Meanwhile, the human reviewer caught a real consistency issue (source RPMs in rpms.lock.yaml) that the agent missed. Total agent review cost was ~$4.09 for a 2-line digest swap.

Evidence for existing issues (no new proposals needed)

All improvement opportunities identified are already tracked by open issues:

• Fix empty expected app client_id in pre-fetch-prior-review for per-repo install mode fullsend-ai/fullsend#5388 and Prior review pre-fetch fails to find existing review in per-repo install mode when REVIEW_APP_CLIENT_ID is empty fullsend-ai/agents#203: REVIEW_APP_CLIENT_ID was empty in both review runs, causing pre-fetch-prior-review.sh to report "No prior review found" even though a CHANGES_REQUESTED review existed. This is the direct cause of duplicate review work on this PR.
• Review agent should assess semantic significance of protected-path changes before assigning high severity fullsend-ai/agents#741, Add an ec inspect policy-data command #513, Bump k8s.io/client-go from 0.26.3 to 0.27.0 in /acceptance #614: The agent self-classified this as a "Docker digest update" mechanical change (noted in style-conventions early-exit logic) yet still dispatched all sub-agents at Opus cost and escalated [protected-path] to HIGH severity. A semantic significance check or lightweight mode short-circuit would have avoided the false positive.
• Review sub-agents should handle model unavailability with fallback or explicit alerting fullsend-ai/agents#379 and Review sub-agents should fall back to an available model when the primary model is unavailable fullsend-ai/fullsend#1771: The style-conventions sonnet sub-agent failed in both runs due to model unavailability on the vertex deployment. No impact on outcome but confirms the recurring model fallback gap.
• Review agent should suppress governance CHANGES_REQUESTED when human approvals already satisfy the gate fullsend-ai/agents#680 and Abstraction over kubernetes cluster type #304: The agent's CHANGES_REQUESTED persisted even after simonbaird (human) approved. Suppressing governance-only change requests when a human approval already satisfies the gate would have prevented this friction.

Autonomy readiness note

The human reviewer's value was domain-specific: knowing that source RPMs are intentionally excluded on release-v0.7 and main. This is cross-branch consistency knowledge that would be difficult to encode in agent instructions. The agent correctly identified no correctness or security issues with the actual digest change itself.