Det, The Signing Proxy #131
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This patch adds `det`, which is a proxy that always signs with the same exact signature. This allows for deterministic deployment addresses since it's a variety of content-addressable signatures. See the README.md in `det/` for more details. Note: I can't get it to work right now, but it... should... work? Like it's accepted to the mempool _then ignored_ which might indicate that the signature is not, in fact, valid, but looks valid to EthersJS and Infura.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This patch adds
det, which is a proxy that always signs with the same exact signature. This allows for deterministic deployment addresses since it's a variety of content-addressable signatures. See the README.md indet/for more details.Note: I can't get it to work right now, but it... should... work? Like it's accepted to the mempool then ignored which might indicate that the signature is not, in fact, valid, but looks valid to EthersJS and Infura.