-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
chore(marketplace): use canProofBeMarkedAsMissing #1188
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
2-towns
wants to merge
5
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
chore/fix-mark-proof-as-missing
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+66
−18
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -189,7 +189,46 @@ ethersuite "On-Chain Market": | |
let missingPeriod = | ||
periodicity.periodOf((await ethProvider.currentTime()).truncate(uint64)) | ||
await advanceToNextPeriod() | ||
check (await market.canProofBeMarkedAsMissing(slotId, missingPeriod)) == true | ||
check (await market.canMarkProofAsMissing(slotId, missingPeriod)) == true | ||
|
||
test "can check whether a proof cannot be marked as missing when the slot is free": | ||
let slotId = slotId(request, slotIndex) | ||
await market.requestStorage(request) | ||
await market.reserveSlot(request.id, slotIndex) | ||
await market.fillSlot(request.id, slotIndex, proof, request.ask.collateralPerSlot) | ||
await waitUntilProofRequired(slotId) | ||
|
||
await market.freeSlot(slotId(request.id, slotIndex)) | ||
|
||
let missingPeriod = | ||
periodicity.periodOf((await ethProvider.currentTime()).truncate(uint64)) | ||
await advanceToNextPeriod() | ||
check (await market.canMarkProofAsMissing(slotId, missingPeriod)) == false | ||
|
||
test "can check whether a proof cannot be marked as missing before a proof is required": | ||
let slotId = slotId(request, slotIndex) | ||
Comment on lines
+208
to
+209
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Considering that each test starts off at the exact same point and assuming that the block hashes will always be deterministic, this test SHOULD work every time, but there may be a chance that there is a proof required as soon as the slot is filled. |
||
await market.requestStorage(request) | ||
await market.reserveSlot(request.id, slotIndex) | ||
await market.fillSlot(request.id, slotIndex, proof, request.ask.collateralPerSlot) | ||
|
||
let missingPeriod = | ||
periodicity.periodOf((await ethProvider.currentTime()).truncate(uint64)) | ||
await advanceToNextPeriod() | ||
check (await market.canMarkProofAsMissing(slotId, missingPeriod)) == false | ||
|
||
test "can check whether a proof cannot be marked as missing if the proof was submitted": | ||
let slotId = slotId(request, slotIndex) | ||
await market.requestStorage(request) | ||
await market.reserveSlot(request.id, slotIndex) | ||
await market.fillSlot(request.id, slotIndex, proof, request.ask.collateralPerSlot) | ||
await waitUntilProofRequired(slotId) | ||
|
||
await market.submitProof(slotId(request.id, slotIndex), proof) | ||
|
||
let missingPeriod = | ||
periodicity.periodOf((await ethProvider.currentTime()).truncate(uint64)) | ||
await advanceToNextPeriod() | ||
check (await market.canMarkProofAsMissing(slotId, missingPeriod)) == false | ||
|
||
test "supports slot filled subscriptions": | ||
await market.requestStorage(request) | ||
|
@@ -548,7 +587,7 @@ ethersuite "On-Chain Market": | |
switchAccount(host) | ||
await market.reserveSlot(request.id, 0.uint64) | ||
await market.fillSlot(request.id, 0.uint64, proof, request.ask.collateralPerSlot) | ||
let filledAt = (await ethProvider.currentTime()) - 1.u256 | ||
let filledAt = await ethProvider.currentTime() | ||
|
||
for slotIndex in 1 ..< request.ask.slots: | ||
await market.reserveSlot(request.id, slotIndex.uint64) | ||
|
@@ -575,7 +614,7 @@ ethersuite "On-Chain Market": | |
switchAccount(host) | ||
await market.reserveSlot(request.id, 0.uint64) | ||
await market.fillSlot(request.id, 0.uint64, proof, request.ask.collateralPerSlot) | ||
let filledAt = (await ethProvider.currentTime()) - 1.u256 | ||
let filledAt = await ethProvider.currentTime() | ||
|
||
for slotIndex in 1 ..< request.ask.slots: | ||
await market.reserveSlot(request.id, slotIndex.uint64) | ||
|
Submodule codex-contracts-eth
updated
from c00152 to 2d5a34
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we should add a test that checks if a proof is required before the slot is filled (also free)