fix(awards): audit and verify complete historical winner list - #133
Queued
mrbobbytables wants to merge 3 commits into
Queued
mrbobbytables wants to merge 3 commits into
mrbobbytables wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
- Audited all 15 data/awards.json entries (Top End User Award, 2018-2026) against the canonical history at https://contribute.cncf.io/community/awards/. Count matches the published history exactly: no missing years/winners and no extras. - Fetched every announcementUrl, caseStudyUrl, and talkUrl (26 URLs total) and confirmed each resolves (HTTP 200) to a real page whose title/content matches the corresponding award entry. All were already correct; no broken or mismatched links found. - Added verifiedAt/verifiedAgainst/verificationNote top-level fields to data/awards.json so the completeness audit is a recorded, re-checkable fact instead of tribal knowledge, addressing 'no record of which entries have been source-checked.' - Extended validate-awards.mjs to require verifiedAt (parseable date) and verifiedAgainst (https URL) on the awards file, and updated/added tests. - Surfaced the verification date and source as a note on the /awards page (AwardsTimeline component), matching the sync-status pattern already used on /architectures, /community, and /members. - Checked the Awards box in ROADMAP.md Phase 1, since completeness and per-entry verification are now both true and enforced by CI. Fixes cncf#77. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Jorge Castro <jcastro@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jorge Castro <jcastro@linuxfoundation.org>
castrojo
force-pushed
the
strategist/awards-completeness-77
branch
from
September 15, 2026 13:28
b2e55de to
fa472ae
Compare
github-merge-queue
Bot
removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a conflict with the base branch
Sep 15, 2026
Signed-off-by: Jorge Castro <jcastro@linuxfoundation.org>
castrojo
approved these changes
Sep 15, 2026
castrojo
left a comment
castrojo
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approved clean awards completeness verification.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #77.
Problem
data/awards.json contained 15 Top End User Award entries, but there was no record of whether they'd been checked for completeness against the full CNCF award history, and ROADMAP.md Phase 1 explicitly calls for a "complete historical winner list, each entry verified against its cncf.io announcement."
Audit performed
I audited the full Top End User Award history from the canonical source, https://contribute.cncf.io/community/awards/ (2018-2026, since that's when the award series starts):
Net result: the existing data was already accurate and complete; the problem was that this had never been recorded anywhere.
Changes
No per-year gap issues were filed, since the audit found no gaps to file.
Verification