Skip to content
David Nolen edited this page Jan 5, 2013 · 5 revisions

The tabling implementation could use some attending to. Currently the tabling implementation generates a lot of redundant information instead of sharing information across tabled calls. For example currently after some calls to a tabled goal - the goal table looks like this:

t = { arg: #{ans0, ans1, ans2, ..., ansN}
     ans0: #{ans1, ans2, ..., ansN}
     ans1: #{ans2, ..., ansN}
     ... }

Yuck! :)

It maybe the case that tabling interacts oddly with constraints. In Nada Amin's TAPL repo, the tabled reducer shows the correct results but also shows some spurious contraints. We should investigate.

Clone this wiki locally