-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
Added additional safety details as requested by external review for IEC 61010-1 #407
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
… alignment is still possible
This pull request is automatically being deployed by Amplify Hosting (learn more). |
components/husky_a300/husky_a300_replacing_fuses_board_mount.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/husky_a300/husky_a300_replacing_fuses_mini_blade.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/husky_a300/husky_a300_replacing_fuses_mini_blade.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/husky_a300/husky_a300_replacing_fuses_board_mount.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have added several comments of suggested changes. I am approving the PR as is, to allow @jhiggins-cpr to decide what changes to make.
…EC 61010-1 (#407) * Clarified intended use per safety review feedback * Specified torque when reinstalling the tray * Improved alignment between A300 and AMP maintenance sections; further alignment is still possible * Clarified charger details per safety review feedback * Aligned common replacement items and added maintenance procedures for fuses * Added post-maintenance checks * Add board mount fuses * Minor corrections based on feedback from JB * Updated terminal speeds to be aligned with risk assessment and test data * Updates based on review feedback
No description provided.