Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CXFLW-1520 GH | PR decoration comments interacting with CxFlow #1421

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

satyamchaurasiapersistent
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Description & Value:

The goal is for users to be able to inquire about what CXFlow is doing by commenting with @CXFlow in their respective bug tracker. CXFlow would then capture these events and interpret the command in the comment (e.g., update, rescan, or other actions). For unsupported commands like "open the pod bay doors" (an impossible command for CXFlow), the system would respond with, "I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave."

Background:

In a PR the developer is waiting for a scan and sometimes would like to get some information or take some actions with CxFlow.

User Flow:

Recording: link

Commands

@CXFlow scan-status

@CXFlow re-scan

@CXFlow cancel-scan

Acceptance Criteria:

It's possible to write some commands in the comment section and get information

Functional Requirements:

Command Capture and Interpretation:

When a comment is made with @CXFlow, we need to parse it to determine whether it's a valid command like update or rescan. If it's unsupported, the system will respond with a predefined message like "I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave."

Advantage: This interaction would improve user engagement, allowing users to feel more in control of the process.

Disadvantage: Implementing this functionality across various bug trackers will be time-consuming and will require careful command parsing and error handling.

Bug Tracker Integration:

We plan to integrate this functionality one bug tracker at a time. This incremental approach would allow us to manage the complexity and tailor the feature per tracker.

Advantage: Gradually rolling out this feature reduces the risk of system-wide issues and allows for a smoother adoption process.

Disadvantage: It would take a significant amount of time to cover all bug trackers, delaying full implementation across the system.

Handling Unsupported Commands:

If the user requests an action that is not supported, such as "open the pod bay doors," CXFlow will respond with, "I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave." This ensures that the system gracefully handles invalid inputs.

Advantage: Provides clear feedback for unsupported commands, making the system more robust and user-friendly.

Disadvantage: If not properly managed, the system may end up responding frequently with this fallback message, which could become repetitive or frustrating for users.

Phased Rollout:

Given the complexity of this task, we are not closing this issue immediately. Instead, we will break it into smaller tasks and start by implementing this functionality for one bug tracker in the upcoming releases.

Advantage: Phasing this rollout allows us to focus on a high-quality implementation and learn from early feedback.

Disadvantage: This phased approach means that full functionality will not be available immediately, which may limit user satisfaction in the short term.

By implementing these improvements, we aim to make CXFlow more interactive and responsive, while also acknowledging that full integration will take time due to the complexity of supporting multiple bug trackers.

@AvivCx
Copy link
Contributor

AvivCx commented Jan 28, 2025

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details29d98555-95c3-4b00-b00e-fd90fae11736

New Issues (14)

Checkmarx found the following issues in this Pull Request

Severity Issue Source File / Package Checkmarx Insight
CRITICAL CVE-2024-50379 Maven-org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core-10.1.31 Vulnerable Package
CRITICAL CVE-2024-56337 Maven-org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core-10.1.31 Vulnerable Package
MEDIUM CVE-2024-12798 Maven-ch.qos.logback:logback-core-1.4.14 Vulnerable Package
MEDIUM CVE-2024-12798 Maven-ch.qos.logback:logback-classic-1.4.14 Vulnerable Package
MEDIUM CVE-2024-38828 Maven-org.springframework:spring-webmvc-6.1.14 Vulnerable Package
MEDIUM Privacy_Violation /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/service/GitLabService.java: 480
detailsMethod at line 480 of /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/service/GitLabService.java sends user information outside the application. This may consti...
Attack Vector
MEDIUM Privacy_Violation /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/service/GitLabService.java: 480
detailsMethod at line 480 of /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/service/GitLabService.java sends user information outside the application. This may consti...
Attack Vector
MEDIUM Privacy_Violation /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/service/GitLabService.java: 480
detailsMethod at line 480 of /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/service/GitLabService.java sends user information outside the application. This may consti...
Attack Vector
MEDIUM SSRF /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/controller/FlowController.java: 83
detailsThe application sends a request to a remote server, for some resource, using getMergeNoteUri in /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/service/GitHubSer...
Attack Vector
MEDIUM SSRF /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/dto/github/CxFlowCommandHandler.java: 192
detailsThe application sends a request to a remote server, for some resource, using urlTemplate in /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/service/GitHubService...
Attack Vector
MEDIUM SSRF /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/dto/github/CxFlowCommandHandler.java: 192
detailsThe application sends a request to a remote server, for some resource, using urlTemplate in /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/service/GitHubService...
Attack Vector
LOW CVE-2024-12801 Maven-ch.qos.logback:logback-core-1.4.14 Vulnerable Package
LOW Log_Forging /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/controller/GitHubController.java: 98
detailsMethod at line 98 of /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/controller/GitHubController.java gets user input from element body. This element’s value fl...
Attack Vector
LOW Log_Forging /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/controller/GitHubController.java: 101
detailsMethod at line 101 of /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/controller/GitHubController.java gets user input from element controllerRequest. This elem...
Attack Vector
Fixed Issues (12)

Great job! The following issues were fixed in this Pull Request

Severity Issue Source File / Package
MEDIUM SSRF /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/controller/FlowController.java: 83
MEDIUM SSRF /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/controller/FlowController.java: 83
MEDIUM SSRF /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/controller/FlowController.java: 83
MEDIUM SSRF /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/controller/FlowController.java: 83
MEDIUM SSRF /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/controller/FlowController.java: 83
MEDIUM SSRF /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/controller/FlowController.java: 72
MEDIUM SSRF /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/controller/FlowController.java: 75
LOW Log_Forging /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/controller/GitHubController.java: 259
LOW Log_Forging /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/utils/ScanUtils.java: 218
LOW Log_Forging /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/controller/GitHubController.java: 440
LOW Log_Forging /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/controller/GitHubController.java: 444
LOW Log_Forging /src/main/java/com/checkmarx/flow/controller/GitHubController.java: 445

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants