-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Added Agentic Search Cookbook #2053
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
@@ -0,0 +1,592 @@ | |||
{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@@ -0,0 +1,592 @@ | |||
{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Line #4. model_platform=ModelPlatformType.DEFAULT,
for the model_platform and model_type, better set up open ai instead of DEFAULT
?
Reply via ReviewNB
@@ -0,0 +1,592 @@ | |||
{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Line #18. tools=[FunctionTool(SearchToolkit().search_google)],
use search_duckduckgo
instead of search_google
,so that user don't need to config google api key?
Reply via ReviewNB
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we make some comment like chose search_duckduckgo (no need apikey ),chose search_google,the apikey link:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we make some comment like chose search_duckduckgo (no need apikey ),chose search_google,the apikey link:
Thanks @zjrwtx, I can add some comments on that
@@ -0,0 +1,592 @@ | |||
{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks @JoyceXu02 , left some comments above |
Thanks @Wendong-Fan, I added roleplay to the original implementation in the cookbook. |
@@ -0,0 +1,651 @@ | |||
{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@@ -0,0 +1,676 @@ | |||
{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @zjrwtx, I have added critic and roleplaying comments at the beginning.
thanks @JoyceXu02 ,LGTM.what do you thinks @Wendong-Fan |
Description
Added agent search cookbook to the docs
Checklist
Go over all the following points, and put an
x
in all the boxes that apply.Fixes #issue-number
in the PR description (required)pyproject.toml
anduv lock
Fix #1686