Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Syncing from upstream OCA/operating-unit (17.0) #660

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 15, 2025
Merged

Conversation

bt-admin
Copy link

bt_gitbot

aleuffre and others added 3 commits February 13, 2025 09:24
Do not check OU on locations that do not have a warehouse at all
Odoo's base `stock` module will still fill the `warehouse_id` field
incorrectly with the company's default warehouse

This allows the user to set reordering rules for e.g.
a subcontracting location
Signed-off-by AaronHForgeFlow
@bt-admin bt-admin added the 17.0 label Feb 15, 2025
@bt-admin bt-admin merged commit 902a331 into brain-tec:17.0 Feb 15, 2025
4 checks passed
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 15, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.41%. Comparing base (4eda22b) to head (3675880).
Report is 29 commits behind head on 17.0.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
stock_operating_unit/model/stock_warehouse.py 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             17.0     #660      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.51%   88.41%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         141      141              
  Lines        1811     1813       +2     
  Branches      163      164       +1     
==========================================
  Hits         1603     1603              
- Misses        156      158       +2     
  Partials       52       52              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants