#206 Protect /status-reviews URL path with Password for security #216
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a password authentication mechanism for the status reviews page. A new login form is displayed until a correct password is entered. Once authenticated, the component saves the state in session storage and fetches reviews. A secure API endpoint compares the submitted password against a secret token using a timing-safe comparison. Additional unit tests validate both the page and API behaviors, while a new CSS module provides styles for the authentication interface. The testing setup is updated to include global text encoding/decoding and fetch mocking. Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested Reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
src/app/(moderation)/status-reviews/page.tsx (2)
14-36:⚠️ Potential issueEnhance API security with proper session management.
The current implementation lacks session management and token validation for API requests.
Add session token validation:
useEffect(() => { if (!isAuthenticated) return; const fetchReviews = async () => { try { const response = await fetch('/api/reviews', { + headers: { + 'Authorization': `Bearer ${sessionStorage.getItem('authToken')}`, + }, }); if (!response.ok) { + if (response.status === 401) { + setIsAuthenticated(false); + return; + } throw new Error(`HTTP error! status: ${response.status}`); }
28-32: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove error handling and user feedback.
The current error handling could be more informative and user-friendly.
Enhance error handling:
setReviews(data.data); } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to fetch reviews:', error); setError( - error instanceof Error ? error : new Error('Failed to fetch reviews') + error instanceof Error + ? error + : new Error('Unable to load reviews. Please try again later.') ); + if (!isAuthenticated) { + setIsAuthenticated(false); + } }
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/app/(moderation)/status-reviews/page.tsx (1)
46-62: Improve authentication form usability.The current implementation could benefit from better user experience.
Add these improvements:
+ const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false); + + const handleKeyPress = (e: React.KeyboardEvent) => { + if (e.key === 'Enter') { + handleLogin(); + } + }; if (!isAuthenticated) { return ( <div className={st.container}> <h2 className={st.header}>Enter Password</h2> <input type="password" value={password} onChange={(e) => setPassword(e.target.value)} + onKeyPress={handleKeyPress} placeholder="Enter password" className={st.input} + disabled={isLoading} /> - <button onClick={handleLogin} className={st.button}> - Submit + <button + onClick={handleLogin} + className={st.button} + disabled={isLoading} + > + {isLoading ? 'Authenticating...' : 'Submit'} </button> </div> ); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/app/(moderation)/status-reviews/page.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/statusReviewsPage/ReviewAuth.module.css(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/components/statusReviewsPage/ReviewAuth.module.css
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/preview.yaml (1)
145-148: Upgrade SonarQube Scan Action VersionThe SonarQube scan action has been updated to use
sonarsource/[email protected]. Ensure that this new version is fully compatible with your existing configuration and that you have reviewed its release notes for any breaking changes or modified input parameters. The environment variable (SONAR_TOKEN) is still correctly passed, but it might be beneficial to verify whether the new version requires additional or altered configuration settings.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/preview.yaml(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: e2e-tests
- GitHub Check: unit-tests
- GitHub Check: lint
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/app/(moderation)/status-reviews/page.test.tsx (2)
24-33: Consider using a more accessible error display method.While the test correctly verifies error handling, using
window.alertfor error messages is not ideal for accessibility and user experience. Consider using an error message component that:
- Is keyboard accessible
- Can be read by screen readers
- Provides better visual feedback
Example implementation:
it('shows an error message on incorrect password', () => { render(<StatusReviewsPage />); fireEvent.change(screen.getByPlaceholderText('Enter password'), { target: { value: 'wrongpassword' }, }); fireEvent.click(screen.getByText('Submit')); expect(screen.getByRole('alert')).toHaveTextContent('Incorrect password'); });
55-69: Enhance error handling with specific status codes.The error handling test could be more comprehensive. Consider:
- Testing different HTTP status codes (401, 403, 404, etc.)
- Displaying specific error messages based on the status code
- Adding retry logic for transient errors
Example enhancement:
it('displays specific error messages based on status code', async () => { process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_REVIEWS_TOKEN = 'correctpassword'; // Test 401 Unauthorized (fetch as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValueOnce({ ok: false, status: 401 }); render(<StatusReviewsPage />); // ... authentication steps ... await waitFor(() => expect(screen.getByText(/Authentication failed/)).toBeInTheDocument() ); // Test 403 Forbidden (fetch as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValueOnce({ ok: false, status: 403 }); // ... similar test steps ... });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/app/(moderation)/status-reviews/page.test.tsx(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: sonarqube
- GitHub Check: e2e-tests
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/app/(moderation)/status-reviews/page.test.tsx (2)
1-13: LGTM! Well-structured test setup.The test setup follows best practices with proper imports, component mocking, and fetch mocking.
14-23: LGTM! Clear and focused test structure.The test suite is well-organized with proper cleanup, and the first test case effectively verifies the basic security requirement of showing a password input.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/app/(moderation)/status-reviews/page.tsx (2)
38-53: Improve error handling and user experience in login function.The current implementation uses alerts and lacks comprehensive error handling.
Consider implementing better error handling and user feedback:
+ const [error, setError] = useState(''); + const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false); + const handleLogin = async () => { + setError(''); + setIsLoading(true); try { const response = await fetch('/api/auth', { method: 'POST', headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json', }, body: JSON.stringify({ password }), }); if (response.ok) { + sessionStorage.setItem('isAuthenticated', 'true'); setIsAuthenticated(true); } else { const data = await response.json(); - alert(data.message || 'Authentication failed'); + setError(data.message || 'Authentication failed'); } + } catch (error) { + setError('Network error. Please try again.'); + } finally { + setIsLoading(false); } };Update the UI to show loading state and error messages:
<button onClick={handleLogin} className={st.button} + disabled={isLoading} > - Submit + {isLoading ? 'Logging in...' : 'Submit'} </button> + {error && <div className={st.error}>{error}</div>}
56-71: Improve form handling and accessibility.The current implementation doesn't handle form submission properly and lacks keyboard accessibility.
Consider using a proper form element with keyboard support:
- <div className={st.container}> + <form + className={st.container} + onSubmit={(e) => { + e.preventDefault(); + handleLogin(); + }} + > <h2 className={st.header}>Enter Password</h2> <input type="password" value={password} onChange={(e) => setPassword(e.target.value)} placeholder="Enter password" className={st.input} + required + minLength={8} + aria-label="Password" /> <button - onClick={handleLogin} + type="submit" className={st.button} + disabled={isLoading} > - Submit + {isLoading ? 'Logging in...' : 'Submit'} </button> + {error && ( + <div className={st.error} role="alert" aria-live="polite"> + {error} + </div> + )} - </div> + </form>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)src/app/(moderation)/status-reviews/page.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/app/(moderation)/status-reviews/page.tsx(2 hunks)src/app/api/auth/route.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/app/(moderation)/status-reviews/page.test.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: e2e-tests
🔇 Additional comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
11-11: LGTM!The changelog entry follows the Keep a Changelog format and correctly documents the new feature with a PR reference.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/app/(moderation)/status-reviews/page.tsx (2)
48-64: Enhance login handling with error handling and loading state.The current implementation lacks error handling for network failures and loading state during authentication.
Apply this diff to improve the login handling:
+ const [authLoading, setAuthLoading] = useState(false); + const handleLogin = async () => { + setAuthLoading(true); try { const response = await fetch('/api/auth', { method: 'POST', headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json', }, body: JSON.stringify({ password }), }); if (response.ok) { setIsAuthenticated(true); sessionStorage.setItem('isAuthenticated', 'true'); } else { const data = await response.json(); alert(data.message || 'Authentication failed'); } + } catch (error) { + alert('Authentication failed. Please try again.'); + } finally { + setAuthLoading(false); } };
70-86: Improve form accessibility with keyboard support.The password form should support form submission via the Enter key for better accessibility.
Apply this diff to enhance the form:
if (!isAuthenticated) { return ( <div className={st.container}> <h2 className={st.header}>Enter Password</h2> + <form onSubmit={(e) => { + e.preventDefault(); + handleLogin(); + }}> <input type="password" value={password} onChange={(e) => setPassword(e.target.value)} placeholder="Enter password" className={st.input} /> - <button onClick={handleLogin} className={st.button}> + <button + type="submit" + className={st.button} + disabled={authLoading} + > - Submit + {authLoading ? 'Submitting...' : 'Submit'} </button> + </form> </div> ); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/app/(moderation)/status-reviews/page.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/app/(moderation)/status-reviews/page.tsx(2 hunks)src/app/api/auth/route.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/app/(moderation)/status-reviews/page.test.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
src/app/api/auth/route.ts (2)
Learnt from: IhorMasechko
PR: boarlabsxyz/Kavoon#216
File: src/app/api/auth/route.ts:3-15
Timestamp: 2025-02-19T07:45:53.344Z
Learning: In the authentication API routes, use crypto.timingSafeEqual for secure password comparison to prevent timing attacks.
Learnt from: IhorMasechko
PR: boarlabsxyz/Kavoon#216
File: src/app/api/auth/route.ts:16-21
Timestamp: 2025-02-19T07:24:38.629Z
Learning: In the authentication endpoint (src/app/api/auth/route.ts), detailed error messages including error.message are acceptable in the error response, as confirmed by the team's decision to skip the suggestion to remove them.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: sonarqube
- GitHub Check: e2e-tests
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/app/api/auth/route.ts (1)
28-35: LGTM! Secure password comparison implemented.The implementation correctly uses
timingSafeEqualfor constant-time password comparison, which prevents timing attacks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/app/api/auth/route.ts (1)
25-34: Consider using a more concise implementation for buffer padding.The current buffer padding implementation can be simplified while maintaining the same security guarantees.
Apply this diff to make the code more concise:
- const providedBuffer = encoder.encode(password); - const secretBuffer = encoder.encode(secret); - - const maxLength = Math.max(providedBuffer.length, secretBuffer.length); - const paddedProvided = new Uint8Array(maxLength); - const paddedSecret = new Uint8Array(maxLength); - - paddedProvided.set(providedBuffer); - paddedSecret.set(secretBuffer); + const providedBuffer = Buffer.from(password); + const secretBuffer = Buffer.from(secret);The
Buffer.from()method automatically handles the encoding and padding, making the code more maintainable while preserving the security properties.src/app/api/auth/auth.test.tsx (1)
13-82: Consider adding a test case for malformed JSON request.The test suite would be more complete with a test case for handling malformed JSON requests.
Add this test case to cover malformed JSON:
it('should return 400 on malformed JSON', async () => { const req = new Request('http://localhost/api/auth', { method: 'POST', body: 'invalid json', headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }, }); const res = await POST(req as unknown as NextRequest); const resBody = await res.json(); expect(res.status).toBe(400); expect(resBody).toHaveProperty('message'); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
jest-setup.ts(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)src/app/(moderation)/status-reviews/page.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/app/api/auth/auth.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/app/api/auth/route.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/app/(moderation)/status-reviews/page.test.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
src/app/api/auth/route.ts (3)
Learnt from: IhorMasechko
PR: boarlabsxyz/Kavoon#216
File: src/app/api/auth/route.ts:3-15
Timestamp: 2025-02-19T07:45:53.344Z
Learning: In the authentication API routes, use crypto.timingSafeEqual for secure password comparison to prevent timing attacks.
Learnt from: IhorMasechko
PR: boarlabsxyz/Kavoon#216
File: src/app/api/auth/route.ts:21-26
Timestamp: 2025-02-19T10:03:55.470Z
Learning: In authentication implementations using `timingSafeEqual`, avoid comparing buffer lengths before the comparison as it can leak information about the secret length, potentially helping attackers narrow down possible passwords.
Learnt from: IhorMasechko
PR: boarlabsxyz/Kavoon#216
File: src/app/api/auth/route.ts:16-21
Timestamp: 2025-02-19T07:24:38.629Z
Learning: In the authentication endpoint (src/app/api/auth/route.ts), detailed error messages including error.message are acceptable in the error response, as confirmed by the team's decision to skip the suggestion to remove them.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: unit-tests
- GitHub Check: e2e-tests
- GitHub Check: lint
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/app/api/auth/route.ts (1)
6-49: LGTM! Secure implementation using timingSafeEqual.The implementation follows security best practices by using timingSafeEqual for constant-time password comparison, which prevents timing attacks.
src/app/api/auth/auth.test.tsx (1)
13-82: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage.The test suite thoroughly covers all critical authentication scenarios with well-organized test cases.
jest-setup.ts (1)
4-10: LGTM! Test setup changes align with PR objectives.The additions of TextEncoder/TextDecoder and jest-fetch-mock are necessary for testing the password-protected status reviews page:
- TextEncoder/TextDecoder support text encoding operations in tests
- jest-fetch-mock enables mocking of fetch requests for password validation
package.json (1)
86-86:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify jest-fetch-mock version compatibility and security.
The specified version (3.0.3) is quite old. Let's verify if there's a newer version available and check for any security advisories.
Also, verify compatibility with Jest 29:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for latest version and security advisories for jest-fetch-mock # Check NPM for latest version echo "Latest version from NPM:" npm view jest-fetch-mock version # Check for security advisories echo -e "\nSecurity advisories from NPM:" npm audit [email protected]Length of output: 557
🌐 Web query:
Is [email protected] compatible with Jest 29?💡 Result:
[email protected] shows partial compatibility with Jest 29 based on the evidence:
Documentation examples demonstrate integration with Jest 27[1][3], but dependency listings show projects using
[email protected]alongside:
[email protected][3]@testing-library/jest-dom@^5.16.1[6][email protected][3]Key compatibility considerations:
- Requires Jest configuration adjustments like:
"jest": { "resetMocks": false // Needed to avoid conflicts[9] }- Uses Jest's core mocking API which remains relatively stable between versions[1][7]
- Has known issues with newer Jest versions requiring manual mock resets[9][10]
While no explicit incompatibilities are documented, some users report needing workarounds when combining these versions[9][10]. The package continues to be used in modern JavaScript testing setups as shown in recent dependency lists[3][6].
Citations:
- 1: https://www.npmjs.com/package/jest-fetch-mock
- 2: https://security.snyk.io/package/npm/jest-fetch-mock
- 3: https://docs.qualified.io/reference/languages/javascript/
- 4: https://github.com/jefflau/jest-fetch-mock/releases
- 5: https://github.com/jefflau/jest-fetch-mock/issues
- 6: https://community.prismic.io/t/updating-prismic-slice-machine-has-broken-storybook/9420
- 7: https://jestjs.io/docs/next/configuration
- 8: https://github.com/mayraamaral/jest-fetch-mock-react-typescript/blob/main/package.json
- 9: jefflau/jest-fetch-mock#194
- 10: jefflau/jest-fetch-mock#190
Jest-Fetch-Mock Version & Security Verification
- The version in
package.jsonremains at 3.0.3, which is currently the latest version available from NPM.- The npm audit check did not run successfully due to the absence of a lockfile. Please generate one (e.g., using
npm i --package-lock-only) so that a proper security audit can be performed.- Web sources indicate that [email protected] shows partial compatibility with Jest 29. However, some manual configuration adjustments (such as ensuring mocks are reset properly) may be necessary to ensure smooth integration.
Please review these points and adjust your Jest configuration as needed.
IhorMasechko
dismissed stale reviews from Anton-88, VitalyyP, and yuramax
via
376ef9f
IhorMasechko
dismissed stale reviews from yuramax, Anton-88, and VitalyyP
via
8e325cb
…sword-for-security
|
IhorMasechko
deleted the
206-protect-status-reviews-url-path-with-password-for-security
branch
Added login page for status reviews
Added login page for status reviews
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation