client ID #3
client ID #3
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduced several new configuration settings, functionality improvements, and adjustments across multiple files. Key changes include adding unique client ID generation, refining error handling, enhancing the YAML language server's settings, and implementing a new HTTP GET method in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Client
participant Returning
participant Server
User->>Client: initialize()
Client->>Returning: new(id: "http-1")
User->>Returning: Get(ctx, path, opts)
Returning->>Server: HTTP GET request (with options)
Server-->>Returning: JSON Response
Returning-->>User: *T, error
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- .coderabbit.yml (1 hunks)
- client.go (7 hunks)
- clientOptions.go (3 hunks)
- clientOptions_test.go (2 hunks)
- client_test.go (6 hunks)
- mockClient.go (6 hunks)
- mockClient_test.go (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .coderabbit.yml
Additional comments not posted (19)
clientOptions.go (2)
9-18: This function is well-implemented.The
ClientIDfunction correctly sets the client ID for requests. The comments are informative and accurately describe the function's purpose and usage.
Line range hint
30-51:
This function is well-implemented.The
URLfunction correctly handles various types for the URL parameter and includes appropriate error handling.clientOptions_test.go (2)
28-40: These test cases are comprehensive and well-structured.The test cases for
ClientIDandURLcover a wide range of scenarios, including error handling and successful cases.
112-138: These test cases are comprehensive and well-structured.The test cases for the
URLfunction cover a wide range of scenarios, including invalid URLs and successful cases.mockClient.go (3)
Line range hint
49-68:
This function is well-implemented.The
NewMockClientfunction correctly sets theidfor the mock client.
193-193: This function is well-implemented.The
ExpectationsWereMetfunction correctly uses theidfor error reporting.
211-211: This function is well-implemented.The
Expectfunction correctly uses theidfor error reporting.mockClient_test.go (2)
39-43: This test case is well-implemented.The
TestNewMockClientfunction correctly checks theidfor the mock client.
201-201: This test case is well-implemented.The
TestMockClientfunction correctly checks theidfor the mock client.client.go (5)
26-29: LGTM! Theseqvariable for unique client IDs is a smart addition.This will ensure each client has a unique identifier.
63-64: LGTM! Renamingnametoidimproves clarity.The
idfield is more descriptive of its purpose.
88-91: LGTM! TheNewClientfunction correctly generates unique client IDs.The removal of the
nameparameter and the use of theseqvariable enhance the functionality.
282-282: LGTM! Theexecutemethod now correctly uses theidfield in error messages.This ensures that error messages are more informative.
292-292: LGTM! TheDomethod now correctly uses theidfield in error messages.This ensures that error messages are more informative.
client_test.go (5)
27-27: LGTM! TheNewClientfunction calls are correctly updated.The removal of the
nameparameter aligns with the changes inclient.go.
712-712: LGTM! TheUnmarshalJSONfunction calls are correctly updated.The removal of the
ctxparameter aligns with the changes inclient.go.
725-725: LGTM! TheUnmarshalJSONfunction calls are correctly updated.The removal of the
ctxparameter aligns with the changes inclient.go.
738-738: LGTM! TheUnmarshalJSONfunction calls are correctly updated.The removal of the
ctxparameter aligns with the changes inclient.go.
143-145: LGTM! The test assertions are correctly updated.The assertions now check the
idfield instead of thenamefield.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- .coderabbit.yml (1 hunks)
- client.go (7 hunks)
- clientOptions.go (3 hunks)
- clientOptions_test.go (2 hunks)
- client_test.go (6 hunks)
- mockClient.go (6 hunks)
- mockClient_test.go (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- .coderabbit.yml
- client.go
- clientOptions.go
- clientOptions_test.go
- client_test.go
- mockClient.go
- mockClient_test.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
requester.go (1)
14-26: Consider adding more context to the wrapped errors.Adding more context to the errors can help with debugging and understanding the source of the issue.
- return nil, errorcontext.Wrap(ctx, err) + return nil, errorcontext.Wrap(ctx, fmt.Errorf("failed to GET %s: %w", path, err))
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- requester.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
requester.go (1)
14-26: Verify the usage ofUnmarshalJSON.Ensure that the
UnmarshalJSONfunction is correctly implemented and handles all necessary edge cases.Verification successful
Verified: The
UnmarshalJSONfunction is correctly implemented and handles all necessary edge cases.
- The function reads the response body and attempts to unmarshal it into the generic type
T.- Errors during reading the response body and unmarshalling the JSON are handled appropriately.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `UnmarshalJSON`. # Test: Search for the implementation of `UnmarshalJSON`. Expect: Correct handling of JSON unmarshalling. rg --type go $'func UnmarshalJSON'Length of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the implementation of `UnmarshalJSON` from client.go. # Search and display the implementation of `UnmarshalJSON` function in client.go ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func UnmarshalJSON[T any](r *http.Response) (*T, error) { $$$ }' client.goLength of output: 773
|
/review |
Code Review Agent Run #3867f3
Code Review Overview
High-level FeedbackEnsure that all client IDs are unique and thread-safe to avoid race conditions. Improve documentation clarity by providing detailed comments and examples. Handle HTTP error status codes appropriately in the 'Get' method. Add comprehensive test cases to cover edge scenarios and potential errors. Validate and sanitize inputs to prevent security risks and ensure robust error handling.Detailed Feedback
📄 mockClient_test.go
Issues: Total - 1, High importance - 1
📄 requester.go
Issues: Total - 1, High importance - 1
📄 clientOptions.go
Issues: Total - 3, High importance - 3
📄 client.go
Issues: Total - 1, High importance - 1
📄 clientOptions_test.go
Issues: Total - 2, High importance - 2
📄 client_test.go
Issues: Total - 1, High importance - 1
📄 mockClient.go
Issues: Total - 1, High importance - 1
AI Code Review powered by |
| @@ -36,11 +36,11 @@ func TestNewMockClient(t *testing.T) { | |||
|
|
|||
| // ASSERT | |||
| if c, ok := test.IsType[client](t, c); ok { | |||
| test.That(t, c.name).Equals("foo") | |||
| test.That(t, c.id).Equals("foo") | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bito Code Review Agent Run #3867f3 - 07/06/2024, 12:12 am
Code suggestion
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
if c, ok := test.IsType[client](t, c); ok {
- test.That(t, c.id).Equals("foo")
+ test.That(t, c.id).Equals("foo", "Expected client id to be 'foo', but got: %v", c.id)
test.That(t, c.url).Equals("mock://hostname")
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The blugnu/test package used for this test uses a fluent API to assert expected vs actual values. If the test fails, the value of c.id and the value in the argument passed to the Equals() fluent method are both included in the test failure report.
| HttpClient | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (r Returning[T]) Get(ctx context.Context, path string, opts ...func(*Request) error) (*T, error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bito Code Review Agent Run #3867f3 - 07/06/2024, 12:12 am
Code suggestion
@@ -16,6 +16,11 @@ func (r Returning[T]) Get(ctx context.Context, path string, opts ...func(*Request) error) (*T, error) {
resp, err := r.HttpClient.Get(ctx, path, opts...)
if err != nil {
return nil, errorcontext.Wrap(ctx, err)
+ }
+ if resp.StatusCode >= 400 {
+ return nil, errorcontext.Errorf(ctx, "HTTP request failed with status code %d", resp.StatusCode)
+ }
+ defer resp.Body.Close()
result, err := UnmarshalJSON[T](resp)
if err != nil {
| // typically used to differentate between clients in log entries. If no client ID is | ||
| // provided a default value will be applied consisting of the string "http-<seq>" | ||
| // where <seq> is a number that increments for each client created. | ||
| func ClientID(id string) ClientOption { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bito Code Review Agent Run #3867f3 - 07/06/2024, 12:12 am
Code suggestion
@@ -13,7 +13,11 @@ func ClientID(id string) ClientOption {
return func(c *client) error {
if id == "" {
id = fmt.Sprintf("http-%d", nextClientID())
}
c.id = id
return nil
}
}
| // as a string or a *url.URL. | ||
| // | ||
| // If a string is provided, it will be parsed to ensure it is a valid, absolute URL. | ||
| // as any of: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bito Code Review Agent Run #3867f3 - 07/06/2024, 12:12 am
Code suggestion
@@ -19,3 +30,5 @@
-// as a string or a *url.URL.
-//
-// If a string is provided, it will be parsed to ensure it is a valid, absolute URL.
+// as any of:
+// - a string, which will be parsed to ensure it is a valid, absolute URL.
+// - a *url.URL, which will be used directly.
| // string // a which parses to a valid, absolute URL | ||
| // url.URL // a valid, absolute URL | ||
| // *url.URL // a valid, absolute URL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bito Code Review Agent Run #3867f3 - 07/06/2024, 12:12 am
Code suggestion
@@ -32,3 +32,6 @@
+// The following types are supported for URLs:
+// - string: a string that parses to a valid, absolute URL
+// - url.URL: a valid, absolute URL
+// - *url.URL: a pointer to a valid, absolute URL
| w := client{ | ||
| name: name, | ||
| id: "http-" + strconv.Itoa(seq), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bito Code Review Agent Run #3867f3 - 07/06/2024, 12:12 am
Code suggestion
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
func NewClient(opts ...ClientOption) (HttpClient, error) {
seq++
w := client{
- id: "http-" + strconv.Itoa(seq),
+ id: "http-" + uuid.New().String(),
wrapped: http.DefaultClient,
}
errs := make([]error, 0, len(opts))
for _, opt := range opts {
if err := opt(&w); err != nil {
errs = append(errs, err)
}
}
if len(errs) > 0 {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: %w", ErrInitialisingClient, errors.Join(errs...))
}
return w, nil
}
| {scenario: "ClientID", | ||
| exec: func(t *testing.T) { | ||
| // ARRANGE | ||
| sut := &client{} | ||
|
|
||
| // ACT | ||
| err := ClientID("foo")(sut) | ||
|
|
||
| // ASSERT | ||
| test.That(t, err).IsNil() | ||
| test.That(t, sut).Equals(&client{id: "foo"}) | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bito Code Review Agent Run #3867f3 - 07/06/2024, 12:12 am
Code suggestion
@@ -40,0 +41,20 @@
+ {scenario: "ClientID/empty",
+ exec: func(t *testing.T) {
+ // ARRANGE
+ sut := &client{}
+
+ // ACT
+ err := ClientID("")(sut)
+
+ // ASSERT
+ test.That(t, err).IsNil()
+ test.That(t, sut).Equals(&client{id: ""})
+ },
+ },
+ {scenario: "ClientID/long",
+ exec: func(t *testing.T) {
+ // ARRANGE
+ sut := &client{}
+ longID := strings.Repeat("a", 1000)
+
+ // ACT
+ err := ClientID(longID)(sut)
+
+ // ASSERT
+ test.That(t, err).IsNil()
+ test.That(t, sut).Equals(&client{id: longID})
+ },
+ },
| {scenario: "URL/*URL/relative", | ||
| exec: func(t *testing.T) { | ||
| // ARRANGE | ||
| client := &client{} | ||
| url, _ := url.Parse("example.com") | ||
|
|
||
| // ACT | ||
| err := URL(*url)(client) | ||
|
|
||
| // ASSERT | ||
| test.Error(t, err).Is(ErrInvalidURL) | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bito Code Review Agent Run #3867f3 - 07/06/2024, 12:12 am
Code suggestion
@@ -121,0 +122,2 @@
+ if err != nil {
+ t.Fatalf("failed to parse URL: %v", err)
+ }
| @@ -140,6 +140,10 @@ func TestNewRequest(t *testing.T) { | |||
| } | |||
| for _, tc := range testcases { | |||
| t.Run(tc.scenario, func(t *testing.T) { | |||
| // ARRANGE | |||
| seq = 0 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bito Code Review Agent Run #3867f3 - 07/06/2024, 12:12 am
Code suggestion
@@ -143,4 +143,6 @@
// ARRANGE
+ // Resetting seq to 0 to ensure a consistent starting point for the sequence in each test case
seq = 0
// ACT
| @@ -207,7 +208,7 @@ func (mock mockClient) ExpectationsWereMet() error { | |||
| func (mock *mockClient) Expect(method string, path string) *MockRequest { | |||
| if mock.next > 0 { | |||
| msg := "requests have already been made" | |||
| panic(fmt.Errorf("%s: %w: %s", mock.name, ErrCannotChangeExpectations, msg)) | |||
| panic(fmt.Errorf("%s: %w: %s", mock.id, ErrCannotChangeExpectations, msg)) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bito Code Review Agent Run #3867f3 - 07/06/2024, 12:12 am
Code suggestion
@@ -209,6 +209,10 @@
func (mock *mockClient) Expect(method string, path string) *MockRequest {
if mock.next > 0 {
msg := "requests have already been made"
+ if mock.id == "" {
+ mock.id = "unknown-client"
+ }
panic(fmt.Errorf("%s: %w: %s", mock.id, ErrCannotChangeExpectations, msg))
}
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Returningstruct, enhancing JSON handling capabilities.Refactor
nametoidacross various client and mockClient files for consistency.Tests
nametoid.Chores
.coderabbit.ymlconfiguration file for YAML language server settings.