Skip to content

MNT: Upgrade eslint to 8.17 #1466

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 7, 2022

Conversation

effigies
Copy link
Collaborator

@effigies effigies commented Jun 7, 2022

Mostly in response to an error (albeit non-breaking) seen while reviewing #1464. I assume there isn't a strong reason to hold onto 5.2.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 7, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1466 (aa4aaea) into master (f3b443b) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head aa4aaea differs from pull request most recent head 7be4f9a. Consider uploading reports for the commit 7be4f9a to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1466   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.02%   84.02%           
=======================================
  Files          90       90           
  Lines        3650     3650           
  Branches     1109     1109           
=======================================
  Hits         3067     3067           
  Misses        489      489           
  Partials       94       94           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f3b443b...7be4f9a. Read the comment docs.

@sappelhoff
Copy link
Member

tests pass, merging, thanks!

@sappelhoff sappelhoff merged commit 849fbef into bids-standard:master Jun 7, 2022
rwblair pushed a commit to sjeung/bids-validator that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2022
@effigies effigies deleted the mnt/upgrade-eslint branch August 7, 2024 01:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants