Further unify/optimize widths of Lower w
/omega under Quasi-Proportional.
#2617
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Much like the case in #2615 , this is me further adjusting (i.e. rolling back) some of the changes of #2611 in regards to lower
w
as I again believe I made it too wide. Basically the aperture of singlev
is optically wider of that ofu
and should not have been used as a basis for the width ofw
simply as an analogue ofɯ
. Also, I don't think any "diagonal correction" code in place for lowerw
is properly equipped for the wider width yet.I don't have any screenshots saved on my PC of lower
w
under the previous widths at this current time, but some relevant screenshots of it still exist in the PR body of #2611 in case you need them for comparison.Aile Thin Upright:
Aile Regular Upright:
Aile Heavy Upright:
Aile Thin Italic:
Aile Regular Italic:
Aile Heavy Italic:
Etoile Thin Upright:
Etoile Regular Upright:
Etoile Heavy Upright:
Etoile Thin Italic:
Etoile Regular Italic:
Etoile Heavy Italic: