custom integration docs

[wixysam]

No description provided.

[claude]

Claude finished @wixysam's task —— View job

---

Claude Code has reviewed this PR

Review Checklist

• Analyze code changes and gather context
• Review scripts/mintlify-post-processing changes
• Review TypeScript type definition changes
• Check for potential bugs or issues
• Assess performance considerations
• Look for security concerns
• Evaluate test coverage
• Provide comprehensive feedback

PR Review: Custom Integration Docs

This PR updates documentation processing scripts and TypeScript type definitions to improve custom integrations documentation. Here's my review:

✅ Code Quality and Best Practices

Positive aspects:

• The TypeScript type definitions have been enhanced with comprehensive JSDoc documentation including detailed examples
• Good use of type-safe interfaces and proper export statements
• Consistent naming conventions throughout the changes
• The file processing script maintains backward compatibility while adding new features

Suggestions for improvement:

• The file processing script (file-processing.js) has grown quite large (976 lines). Consider breaking it down into smaller modules for better maintainability:
  • Module renaming logic → module-renames.js
  • Link processing → link-processor.js
  • Type declaration linking → type-linker.js
  • Article appending → article-appender.js

🐛 Potential Bugs or Issues

1. Insufficient error handling in linkTypeDeclarationToSections (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:767-827):

   • The function doesn't handle cases where type names might contain special regex characters
   • Consider escaping type names before using them in regex patterns

2. Missing null checks in prepareAppendedSection (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:602-616):

   • No validation that appendPath exists before reading
   • Could throw uncaught errors if file is missing

⚡ Performance Considerations

1. Multiple file reads in applyNonExposedTypeLinkRemoval (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:892-919):

   • The function reads, processes, and writes files one at a time
   • Consider batching file operations or using async/parallel processing for better performance with large documentation sets

2. Repeated regex operations:

   • Multiple regex replacements are performed on the same content
   • Consider combining related regex operations where possible

🔒 Security Concerns

No significant security issues identified. The code:

• Properly uses path.join() for file paths to prevent directory traversal
• Doesn't execute any user input
• File operations are limited to the documentation directory

✅ Test Coverage

Good coverage exists:

• Comprehensive unit tests for custom integrations functionality (tests/unit/custom-integrations.test.ts)
• Tests cover happy paths, error cases, edge cases, and parameter validation

Missing test coverage:

• No tests found for the file processing script changes
• Consider adding tests for:
  • Module renaming logic
  • Link processing and removal
  • Type declaration linking
  • Article appending functionality

📝 Additional Observations

1. Documentation improvements in TypeScript files are excellent:

   • Added detailed JSDoc comments with multiple examples
   • Clear parameter descriptions and return type documentation
   • Good explanation of authentication modes and use cases

2. Type safety improvements:

   • ConnectorIntegrationType is now properly typed as string instead of a more complex union
   • Better separation of concerns between connectors and custom integrations modules

3. The CustomIntegrationsModule interface now properly exports:

   • This was added to the types-to-expose.json, making it available in the generated docs

🎯 Recommendations

1. Add tests for the file processing script - Critical functionality should have test coverage
2. Consider breaking down the large file processing script - Improves maintainability
3. Add error boundaries around file operations to gracefully handle missing files
4. Document the appended-articles.json format - Add comments or a README explaining the expected structure

Overall, this is a solid PR that improves the documentation quality for custom integrations. The TypeScript changes are well-documented and the processing script enhancements add useful features. With the suggested improvements, particularly around testing and code organization, this would be production-ready.

[github-actions]

🚀 Package Preview Available!

---

Install this PR's preview build with npm:

npm i @base44-preview/[email protected]

Prefer not to change any import paths? Install using npm alias so your code still imports @base44/sdk:

npm i "@base44/sdk@npm:@base44-preview/[email protected]"

Or add it to your package.json dependencies:

{
  "dependencies": {
    "@base44/sdk": "npm:@base44-preview/[email protected]"
  }
}

• 📦 Preview Package: @base44-preview/[email protected]
• 🔗 View this commit on GitHub

---

_{Preview published to npm registry — try new features instantly!}

[claude]

Claude finished @wixysam's task —— View job

---

PR Review: Custom Integration Docs

I've completed my review of this pull request that updates documentation processing scripts and TypeScript type definitions for custom integrations. Here's my comprehensive feedback:

✅ Code Quality and Best Practices

Positive aspects:

• Excellent TypeScript documentation with comprehensive JSDoc comments including multiple usage examples (src/modules/*.types.ts)
• Consistent typing and proper export statements throughout
• Good separation of concerns between connectors and custom integrations modules
• The ConnectorIntegrationType is now properly typed as string for better flexibility
• Clear interface definitions with detailed property descriptions

Areas for improvement:

• File processing script is too large (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:976 lines)
  • Consider breaking it into smaller modules:
    • module-renames.js for renaming logic
    • link-processor.js for link processing
    • type-linker.js for type declaration linking
    • article-appender.js for appending articles
    • heading-processor.js for heading normalization

🐛 Potential Bugs or Issues

1. Missing null checks in prepareAppendedSection (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:602-616)

   • No validation that file exists before fs.readFileSync(appendPath)
   • Could throw uncaught errors if file is missing
   • Add existence check: if (!fs.existsSync(appendPath)) { ... }

2. Regex special character handling in linkTypeDeclarationToSections (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:767-827)

   • Type names could contain regex special characters
   • Should escape type names before using in regex patterns
   • Consider using a regex escape function

3. Missing error handling in applyAppendedArticles (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:617-716)

   • Multiple file operations without proper error boundaries
   • Should wrap file operations in try-catch blocks

⚡ Performance Considerations

1. Inefficient file operations in applyNonExposedTypeLinkRemoval (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:892-919)

   • Sequential file read/write operations
   • Consider batching operations or using async/parallel processing
   • Could use Promise.all() for concurrent file processing

2. Multiple regex passes on same content

   • Content is processed multiple times with different regex patterns
   • Consider combining related regex operations in a single pass

3. Repeated directory traversals

   • Multiple functions traverse the same directory structure
   • Could combine traversals to reduce I/O operations

🔒 Security Concerns

No significant security issues identified:

• ✅ Proper use of path.join() prevents directory traversal
• ✅ No execution of user input
• ✅ File operations are limited to documentation directory
• ✅ No sensitive information logging

✅ Test Coverage

Existing coverage:

• Comprehensive unit tests for custom integrations (tests/unit/custom-integrations.test.ts)
• Tests cover parameter validation, error cases, and edge scenarios
• Good coverage of camelCase to snake_case conversion

Missing coverage:

• No tests for file processing script - Critical gap in test coverage
• Recommend adding tests for:
  • Module renaming logic
  • Type link removal functionality
  • Article appending mechanism
  • Heading demotion logic
  • Type declaration linking

📝 Additional Observations

1. Documentation improvements are excellent:

   • Added CustomIntegrationsModule to exposed types (types-to-expose.json)
   • Clear examples showing GitHub, Slack, and custom API usage
   • Well-structured parameter documentation with JSDoc

2. Good architectural decisions:

   • Clean separation between workspace-level custom integrations and app-level connectors
   • Proper error messages for missing parameters
   • Support for path parameters, query parameters, and custom headers

3. The appended-articles.json structure:

   • Now properly handles custom integrations documentation
   • Consider documenting the expected format with comments or README

🎯 Recommendations

1. Priority 1: Add tests for file processing script

   • This is critical functionality that should have test coverage
   • Focus on testing error cases and edge conditions

2. Priority 2: Refactor large file processing script

   • Break into smaller, focused modules
   • Improves maintainability and testability

3. Priority 3: Add error boundaries

   • Wrap file operations in proper error handling
   • Provide meaningful error messages for debugging

4. Consider adding a dry-run mode

   • Allow previewing changes without modifying files
   • Useful for debugging documentation build issues

Overall, this is a solid PR that significantly improves the documentation for custom integrations. The TypeScript changes are well-documented and thoughtfully implemented. With the addition of tests for the file processing script and some refactoring for better maintainability, this will be production-ready.

Review Checklist

• Read and analyze all changed files
• Assess code quality and best practices
• Identify potential bugs or issues
• Evaluate performance considerations
• Check for security concerns
• Review test coverage
• Provide comprehensive feedback

[claude]

Claude finished @wixysam's task —— View job

---

PR Review: Custom Integration Docs

This PR improves documentation processing for custom integrations by updating post-processing scripts and enhancing TypeScript type definitions. Here's my comprehensive review:

✅ Code Quality and Best Practices

Positive aspects:

• Excellent JSDoc documentation added to TypeScript interfaces with comprehensive examples
• Good type safety with proper interface definitions
• Consistent code style and naming conventions
• The ConnectorIntegrationType simplification from complex union to string improves flexibility
• Clear separation between connectors (app-level OAuth) and custom integrations (workspace-level APIs)

Areas for improvement:

• file-processing.js is too large (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:976 lines) - Consider breaking it into smaller modules:
  • module-renames.js for module renaming logic
  • link-processor.js for link processing
  • type-linker.js for type declaration linking
  • article-appender.js for article appending functionality
  • heading-processor.js for heading normalization

🐛 Potential Bugs or Issues

1. Missing error handling in prepareAppendedSection (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:602-616):

   const rawContent = fs.readFileSync(appendPath, "utf-8"); // Could throw if file missing

   • Add existence check: if (!fs.existsSync(appendPath)) { ... }

2. Regex special characters not escaped in linkTypeDeclarationToSections (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:767-827):

   • Type names could contain regex special characters
   • Should escape type names before using in regex patterns

3. No error boundaries in applyAppendedArticles (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:617-716):

   • Multiple file operations without try-catch blocks
   • Could fail silently if file operations error

⚡ Performance Considerations

1. Sequential file operations in applyNonExposedTypeLinkRemoval (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:892-919):

   • Processes files one by one with synchronous read/write
   • Consider batching or using async operations for better performance

2. Repeated directory traversals:

   • Multiple functions traverse the same directory structure
   • Could cache file paths and process in a single pass

3. Multiple regex passes on same content:

   • Content is processed with different regex patterns sequentially
   • Consider combining related regex operations

🔒 Security Concerns

No significant security issues found:

• ✅ Proper use of path.join() prevents directory traversal attacks
• ✅ No execution of user input or dynamic code evaluation
• ✅ File operations are limited to documentation directory
• ✅ No sensitive data logging or exposure

✅ Test Coverage

Existing coverage is excellent:

• Comprehensive unit tests for custom integrations (tests/unit/custom-integrations.test.ts:356 lines)
• Tests cover:
  • Parameter conversion (camelCase to snake_case)
  • Error handling (404, 502 errors)
  • Edge cases (empty params, large payloads, missing arguments)
  • Header passing functionality
  • Integration with other packages

Missing test coverage:

• No tests for file processing script - This is a critical gap:
  • Module renaming logic needs tests
  • Type link removal functionality should be tested
  • Article appending mechanism requires coverage
  • Heading normalization logic needs validation

📝 Additional Observations

1. Documentation improvements are excellent:

   • Added CustomIntegrationsModule to exposed types (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/types-to-expose.json:6)
   • Clear JSDoc examples showing real-world usage patterns
   • Good distinction between workspace-level custom integrations and app-level connectors

2. Type safety improvements:

   • ConnectorIntegrationType now uses string instead of complex union
   • Better flexibility for dynamic integration types

3. The appended-articles.json structure:

   • Now supports arrays for multiple articles per host
   • Good support for module renames (EntityHandler → entities)

🎯 Recommendations

1. Priority 1: Add tests for file processing script

   • This is critical functionality that must have test coverage
   • Focus on error cases and edge conditions

2. Priority 2: Add error handling

   • Wrap file operations in try-catch blocks
   • Provide meaningful error messages for debugging

3. Priority 3: Refactor large file processing script

   • Break into smaller, focused modules
   • Improves maintainability and testability

4. Consider adding a dry-run mode

   • Allow previewing changes without modifying files
   • Useful for debugging documentation build issues

Overall, this is a solid PR that significantly improves documentation for custom integrations. The TypeScript changes are well-documented and thoughtfully implemented. With the addition of tests for the file processing script and some error handling improvements, this will be production-ready.

[claude]

Claude finished @wixysam's task —— View job

---

Claude Code is reviewing this PR…

Review Checklist

• Read all changed files
• Analyze code quality and best practices
• Identify potential bugs or issues
• Assess performance considerations
• Check for security concerns
• Evaluate test coverage
• Provide comprehensive feedback

PR Review: Custom Integration Docs

This PR enhances documentation processing for custom integrations by updating post-processing scripts and improving TypeScript type definitions. Here's my comprehensive review:

✅ Code Quality and Best Practices

Positive aspects:

• Excellent JSDoc documentation added to TypeScript interfaces with detailed examples (src/modules/custom-integrations.types.ts:44-108)
• Good type safety improvements - ConnectorIntegrationType simplified from complex union to string (src/modules/connectors.types.ts:4)
• Clear separation between workspace-level custom integrations and app-level connectors
• Consistent naming conventions and code style throughout
• The CustomIntegrationsModule is now properly exposed in types-to-expose.json

Areas for improvement:

• File processing script is too large (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:976 lines)
  • Consider breaking it into smaller modules:
    • module-renames.js for module renaming logic
    • link-processor.js for link processing
    • type-linker.js for type declaration linking
    • article-appender.js for article appending functionality
    • heading-processor.js for heading normalization

🐛 Potential Bugs or Issues

1. Missing error handling in prepareAppendedSection (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:602-616):

   const rawContent = fs.readFileSync(appendPath, "utf-8"); // Could throw if file missing

   • Add existence check: if (!fs.existsSync(appendPath)) { ... }

2. Regex special characters not escaped in linkTypeDeclarationToSections (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:767-827):

   • Type names could contain regex special characters
   • Should escape type names before using in regex patterns

3. No error boundaries in applyAppendedArticles (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:617-716):

   • Multiple file operations without try-catch blocks
   • Could fail silently if file operations error

⚡ Performance Considerations

1. Sequential file operations in applyNonExposedTypeLinkRemoval (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:892-919):

   • Processes files one by one with synchronous read/write
   • Consider batching or using async operations for better performance

2. Multiple regex passes on same content:

   • Content is processed with different regex patterns sequentially
   • Consider combining related regex operations

3. Repeated directory traversals:

   • Multiple functions traverse the same directory structure
   • Could cache file paths and process in a single pass

🔒 Security Concerns

No significant security issues found:

• ✅ Proper use of path.join() prevents directory traversal attacks
• ✅ No execution of user input or dynamic code evaluation
• ✅ File operations are limited to documentation directory
• ✅ No sensitive data logging or exposure

✅ Test Coverage

Existing coverage is excellent:

• Comprehensive unit tests for custom integrations (tests/unit/custom-integrations.test.ts:356 lines)
• Tests cover:
  • Parameter conversion (camelCase to snake_case)
  • Error handling (404, 502 errors)
  • Edge cases (empty params, large payloads, missing arguments)
  • Header passing functionality
  • Integration with other packages

Missing test coverage:

• No tests for file processing script - This is a critical gap:
  • Module renaming logic needs tests
  • Type link removal functionality should be tested
  • Article appending mechanism requires coverage
  • Heading normalization logic needs validation

📝 Additional Observations

1. Documentation improvements are excellent:

   • Added CustomIntegrationsModule to exposed types (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/types-to-expose.json:6)
   • Clear JSDoc examples showing real-world usage patterns for GitHub, Slack, and custom APIs
   • Good distinction between workspace-level custom integrations and app-level connectors

2. Type safety improvements:

   • Better flexibility for dynamic integration types
   • Proper export of interfaces for documentation generation

3. The appended-articles.json structure:

   • Now supports arrays for multiple articles per host
   • Good support for module renames (EntityHandler → entities)

🎯 Recommendations

1. Priority 1: Add tests for file processing script

   • This is critical functionality that must have test coverage
   • Focus on error cases and edge conditions

2. Priority 2: Add error handling

   • Wrap file operations in try-catch blocks
   • Provide meaningful error messages for debugging

3. Priority 3: Refactor large file processing script

   • Break into smaller, focused modules
   • Improves maintainability and testability

4. Consider adding a dry-run mode

   • Allow previewing changes without modifying files
   • Useful for debugging documentation build issues

Overall, this is a solid PR that significantly improves documentation for custom integrations. The TypeScript changes are well-documented and thoughtfully implemented. With the addition of tests for the file processing script and some error handling improvements, this will be production-ready.

[claude]

Claude finished @wixysam's task —— View job

---

PR Review: Custom Integration Docs

This PR enhances documentation processing for custom integrations by updating post-processing scripts and improving TypeScript type definitions. Here's my comprehensive review:

✅ Code Quality and Best Practices

Positive aspects:

• Excellent JSDoc documentation added to TypeScript interfaces with detailed examples (src/modules/custom-integrations.types.ts:44-97)
• Good type safety improvements - ConnectorIntegrationType simplified from complex union to string (src/modules/connectors.types.ts:4)
• Clear separation between workspace-level custom integrations and app-level connectors
• Consistent naming conventions and code style throughout
• The CustomIntegrationsModule is now properly exposed in types-to-expose.json

Areas for improvement:

• File processing script is too large (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:976 lines)
  • Consider breaking it into smaller modules:
    • module-renames.js for module renaming logic
    • link-processor.js for link processing
    • type-linker.js for type declaration linking
    • article-appender.js for article appending functionality
    • heading-processor.js for heading normalization

🐛 Potential Bugs or Issues

1. Missing error handling in prepareAppendedSection (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:602-616):

   const rawContent = fs.readFileSync(appendPath, "utf-8"); // Could throw if file missing

   • Add existence check: if (!fs.existsSync(appendPath)) { ... }

2. Regex special characters not escaped in linkTypeDeclarationToSections (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:767-827):

   • Type names could contain regex special characters
   • Should escape type names before using in regex patterns:

   const escapeRegex = (str) => str.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\$&');
   const escapedTypeName = escapeRegex(typeName);

3. No error boundaries in applyAppendedArticles (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:617-716):

   • Multiple file operations without try-catch blocks
   • Could fail silently if file operations error

⚡ Performance Considerations

1. Sequential file operations in applyNonExposedTypeLinkRemoval (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/file-processing/file-processing.js:892-919):

   • Processes files one by one with synchronous read/write
   • Consider batching or using async operations for better performance:

   const processFiles = await Promise.all(
     entries.map(async (entry) => {
       // Process file asynchronously
     })
   );

2. Multiple regex passes on same content:

   • Content is processed with different regex patterns sequentially
   • Consider combining related regex operations

3. Repeated directory traversals:

   • Multiple functions traverse the same directory structure
   • Could cache file paths and process in a single pass

🔒 Security Concerns

No significant security issues found:

• ✅ Proper use of path.join() prevents directory traversal attacks
• ✅ No execution of user input or dynamic code evaluation
• ✅ File operations are limited to documentation directory
• ✅ No sensitive data logging or exposure

✅ Test Coverage

Existing coverage is excellent:

• Comprehensive unit tests for custom integrations (tests/unit/custom-integrations.test.ts:356 lines)
• Tests cover:
  • Parameter conversion (camelCase to snake_case)
  • Error handling (404, 502 errors)
  • Edge cases (empty params, large payloads, missing arguments)
  • Header passing functionality
  • Integration with other packages

Missing test coverage:

• No tests for file processing script - This is a critical gap:
  • Module renaming logic needs tests
  • Type link removal functionality should be tested
  • Article appending mechanism requires coverage
  • Heading normalization logic needs validation

📝 Additional Observations

1. Documentation improvements are excellent:

   • Added CustomIntegrationsModule to exposed types (scripts/mintlify-post-processing/types-to-expose.json:6)
   • Clear JSDoc examples showing real-world usage patterns for GitHub, Slack, and custom APIs
   • Good distinction between workspace-level custom integrations and app-level connectors

2. Type safety improvements:

   • Better flexibility for dynamic integration types
   • Proper export of interfaces for documentation generation

3. The appended-articles.json structure:

   • Now supports arrays for multiple articles per host
   • Good support for module renames (EntityHandler → entities)

🎯 Recommendations

1. Priority 1: Add tests for file processing script

   • This is critical functionality that must have test coverage
   • Focus on error cases and edge conditions

2. Priority 2: Add error handling

   • Wrap file operations in try-catch blocks
   • Provide meaningful error messages for debugging

3. Priority 3: Refactor large file processing script

   • Break into smaller, focused modules
   • Improves maintainability and testability

4. Consider adding a dry-run mode

   • Allow previewing changes without modifying files
   • Useful for debugging documentation build issues

Overall, this is a solid PR that significantly improves documentation for custom integrations. The TypeScript changes are well-documented and thoughtfully implemented. With the addition of tests for the file processing script and some error handling improvements, this will be production-ready.

Review Checklist

• Read and analyze all changed files
• Assess code quality and best practices
• Identify potential bugs or issues
• Evaluate performance considerations
• Check for security concerns
• Review test coverage
• Provide comprehensive feedback