Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix the local development environment and update documentation #92

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

tatiana
Copy link
Collaborator

@tatiana tatiana commented Nov 26, 2024

Fix the local development environment using Astro CLI and a Kind Kubernetes cluster, and update the documentation.

While implementing #81, I faced several issues in the local development environment. Unfortunately, the existing documentation and configuration did not allow developers to run the example DAGs locally.

One of the main issues was that Airflow (running in Docker via Astro CLI) could not connect to Kind properly. Once that was solved, another critical problem was that Airflow could not access the Ray clusters created in the Kind Kubernetes cluster.

Some of the issues faced include:

  • Inconsistent connection naming
  • Missing Kind configuration
  • Missing Docker overrides for Astro CLI
  • MacOS Docker/kind network specifics

After applying all these changes, I was able to successfully run all the example DAGs locally:
Screenshot 2024-11-26 at 14 42 21

As illustrated below:

Screenshot 2024-11-26 at 14 42 34

Screenshot 2024-11-26 at 14 42 47

Screenshot 2024-11-26 at 14 42 58

Screenshot 2024-11-26 at 14 43 08

With this PR, I hope to save other Ray provider developers time.

@tatiana
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tatiana commented Nov 26, 2024

I'll make the necessary changes so that the integration tests that use GCP GKE are functional again:
https://github.com/astronomer/astro-provider-ray/actions/runs/12033322234/job/33547286054

pankajastro
pankajastro previously approved these changes Nov 27, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@pankajastro pankajastro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Previously, we were only able to run the example DAG , with a few tweaks. None of the remaining example DAGs would run in the local Kind cluster when using the local Astro CLI setup.

There were multiple reasons for this, including network limitations, default Kind limitations and lack of configuration on the Docker and Kind side.

This PR shares the pain points and the fixes, allowing anyone running the Ray Provider exmaple DAGs in MacOS (M1) to be able to run the example DAGs locally and successfully spin up Ray Clusters from Airflow.
@tatiana tatiana force-pushed the issue-81-local-setup branch from bde4aee to d80e5dc Compare November 27, 2024 14:10
@tatiana tatiana merged commit 7eba460 into main Nov 27, 2024
15 of 16 checks passed
@pankajastro pankajastro deleted the issue-81-local-setup branch November 27, 2024 14:53
@tatiana tatiana added this to the Astro Ray Provider 0.3.0 milestone Nov 29, 2024
@tatiana tatiana mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2024
tatiana added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2024
**Breaking changes**

* Removal of ``SubmitRayJob.terminal_states``. The same values are now available at ``ray_provider.constants.TERMINAL_JOB_STATUSES``.
* Simplify the project structure and debugging by @tatiana in #93

In order to improve the development and troubleshooting DAGs created with this provider, we introduced breaking changes
to the folder structure. It was flattened and the import paths to existing decorators, hooks, operators and trigger
changed, as documented in the table below:
  | Type      | Previous import path                        | Current import path                     |
  |-----------|---------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
  | Decorator | ray_provider.decorators.ray.ray             | ray_provider.decorators.ray             |
  | Hook      | ray_provider.hooks.ray.RayHook              | ray_provider.hooks.RayHook              |
  | Operator  | ray_provider.operators.ray.DeleteRayCluster | ray_provider.operators.DeleteRayCluster |
  | Operator  | ray_provider.operators.ray.SetupRayCluster  | ray_provider.operators.SetupRayCluster  |
  | Operator  | ray_provider.operators.ray.SubmitRayJob     | ray_provider.operators.SubmitRayJob     |
  | Trigger   | ray_provider.triggers.ray.RayJobTrigger     | ray_provider.triggers.RayJobTrigger     |


**Features**

* Support using callable ``config`` in ``@ray.task`` by @tatiana in #103
* Support running Ray jobs indefinitely without timing out by @venkatajagannath and @tatiana in #74

**Bug fixes**

* Fix integration test and bug in load balancer wait logic by @pankajastro in #85
* Bugfix: Better exception handling and cluster clean up by @venkatajagannath in #68
* Stop catching generic ``Exception`` in operators by @tatiana in #100
* Stop catching generic ``Exception`` in trigger by @tatiana in #99

**Docs**

* Add docs to deploy project on Astro Cloud by @pankajastro in #90
* Fix dead reference in docs index page by @pankajastro in #87
* Cloud Auth documentation update by @venkatajagannath in #58
* Improve main docs page by @TJaniF in #71

**Others**

Local development

* Fix the local development environment and update documentation by @tatiana in #92
* Enable secret detection precommit check by @pankajastro in #91
* Add astro cli project + kind Raycluster setup instruction by @pankajastro in #83
* Remove pytest durations from tests by @tatiana in #102
* Fix running make docker-run when there is a new version by @tatiana in #99 and #101
* Improve Astro CLI DAGs test so running hatch test-cov locally doesn't fail by @tatiana in #97

CI

* CI improvement by @venkatajagannath in #73
* CI fix related to broken coverage upload artifact by @pankajkoti in #60
* Allow tests to run for PRs from forked repos by @venkatajagannath in #72
* Update CODEOWNERS by @tatiana in #84
* Add Airflow 2.10 (released in August 2024) to tests by @tatiana in #96
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants