Skip to content

Conversation

@OriolAbril
Copy link
Member

@OriolAbril OriolAbril commented Nov 11, 2025

Prepare for 1.0 release with arviz.preview becoming the "main package".
The main repo will then be a metapackage that installs the 3 arvizverse libraries
and exposes their functions through arviz.xyz.
Consequently, tests are only about aliases coming from the 3 other libraries.

I think we should keep some global docs here. I can look into making the docs of the
other 3 libraries be subprojects of the main one. That means they would get
python.arviz.org/projects/arviz-base/... as URLs, and we can look at doing something
similar to what we do with PyMC to allow searching across all the different websites.

I have also found a couple minor issues with imports and targets for cross-references in the docs.
I will open PRs to the other repos soon.


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://arviz--2494.org.readthedocs.build/en/2494/

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

Comment on lines +11 to +27
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
strategy:
matrix:
python-version: ["3.11", "3.12", "3.13"]
fail-fast: false
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v5
- name: Set up Python ${{ matrix.python-version }}
uses: actions/setup-python@v6
with:
python-version: ${{ matrix.python-version }}
- name: Install dependencies
run: |
python -m pip install --upgrade pip
pip install tox tox-gh-actions
- name: Test with tox
run: SKIP=no-commit-to-branch tox

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Workflow does not contain permissions Medium test

Actions job or workflow does not limit the permissions of the GITHUB_TOKEN. Consider setting an explicit permissions block, using the following as a minimal starting point: {contents: read}
@OriolAbril
Copy link
Member Author

I started copying the preview.py file into __init__.py but I have now realized unless someone does pip install arviz --no-deps all 3 libraries will be installed, so we can probably get rid of the try except blocks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant