chore: git pkg - adding baseIds in package based urls #38827
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new Changes
Suggested Labels
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
github-actions
bot
added
Git Product
github-actions
bot
added
the
skip-changelog
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
app/client/src/navigation/FocusEntity.ts (1)
65-66: Consider documenting the base ID conceptThe introduction of base IDs across packages and modules represents an architectural change. Consider adding documentation explaining the purpose and relationship of these base IDs.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
app/client/src/ce/constants/ModuleConstants.ts(1 hunks)app/client/src/ce/constants/PackageConstants.ts(1 hunks)app/client/src/navigation/FocusEntity.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
app/client/src/ce/constants/PackageConstants.ts (1)
5-5: Verify if this is a breaking changeThe addition of
baseIdto the Package interface could be a breaking change if this field is required. Consider making it optional with?if backward compatibility is needed.✅ Verification successful
No breaking change concerns for Package interface
The addition of
baseIdfield to the Package interface is safe as this is an enterprise-only feature with proper isolation between CE and EE implementations.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Package interface usage to verify impact rg -t typescript "Package\s*[:{]" --no-headingLength of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Package interface definition and usage rg -t ts "Package" -A 5 -B 5 # Also search specifically in the constants directory fd . "app/client/src/ce/constants" -t f -e ts -x cat {}Length of output: 74004
Script:
#!/bin/bash # View the Package interface definition cat app/client/src/ce/constants/PackageConstants.tsLength of output: 473
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Package and PackageMetadata usage rg -t ts "Package|PackageMetadata" -B 2 -A 2 # Also check for any existing package-related files fd "package" -t f -e tsLength of output: 65774
app/client/src/ce/constants/ModuleConstants.ts (1)
23-23: Ensure consistent usage with Package interfaceThe addition of
baseIdmatches the Package interface pattern. Consider documenting the relationship between Module's baseId and Package's baseId.✅ Verification successful
Addition of baseId is safe and consistent
The baseId field addition to the Module interface is a non-breaking change that aligns with the Package interface pattern. No existing implementations will be affected by this addition.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Module interface usage and verify impact rg -t typescript "Module\s*[:{]" --no-headingLength of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Module interface definition and usage rg "interface\s+Module|implements\s+Module|extends\s+Module" -l # Search for baseId usage in relation to modules rg "baseId.*Module|Module.*baseId" -A 2 -B 2 # Find type references to Module rg ": Module(\[\])?(\s*|,|;|=)" -A 1 -B 1Length of output: 4281
app/client/src/navigation/FocusEntity.ts (1)
65-66: Verify route matching updatesThe renaming of
packageIdtobasePackageIdandmoduleIdtobaseModuleIdneeds corresponding updates in route definitions and consumers.
Description
packageIdtobasePackageIdmoduleIdtobaseModuleIdFixes #38504
Fixes #38503
Fixes #38502
Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Module"
🔍 Cypress test results
Caution
If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR.
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
baseIdproperty to Module and Package interfacesbasePackageIdandbaseModuleId