Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update user display name from user.userID to user.name #5213

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kalavt
Copy link

@kalavt kalavt commented Aug 29, 2024

What's the purpose of this PR

Fix user name display issue

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Brief changelog

change user display name from user.userID to user.name

Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Read the Contributing Guide before making this pull request.
  • Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
  • Write necessary unit tests to verify the code.
  • Run mvn clean test to make sure this pull request doesn't break anything.
  • Update the CHANGES log.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated the role management interface to display user names instead of user IDs for improved clarity and user experience.

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updating the user identifier displayed in the role management interface from user.userId to user.name. This modification affects multiple instances where user roles are shown, ensuring that user names are presented instead of their IDs, while maintaining the overall functionality of role management.

Changes

Files Change Summary
apollo-portal/src/main/resources/static/namespace/role.html Updated user identifier from user.userId to user.name in role management interface.

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
User names now shine bright as day.
No more IDs, just names to see,
Hopping along, so clear and free!
With each role change, we cheer and prance,
A joyful leap in our coding dance! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 29, 2024

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f4a0236 and d621329.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • apollo-portal/src/main/resources/static/namespace/role.html (5 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
apollo-portal/src/main/resources/static/namespace/role.html (4)

77-77: LGTM!

The change from user.userId to user.name improves the user interface by displaying the user's name instead of their user ID.

The code changes are approved.


89-89: LGTM!

The change from user.userId to user.name improves the user interface by displaying the user's name instead of their user ID.

The code changes are approved.


126-126: LGTM!

The change from user.userId to user.name improves the user interface by displaying the user's name instead of their user ID.

The code changes are approved.


139-139: LGTM!

The change from user.userId to user.name improves the user interface by displaying the user's name instead of their user ID.

The code changes are approved.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 50.35%. Comparing base (f55b419) to head (d621329).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #5213      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     50.30%   50.35%   +0.05%     
- Complexity     2013     2017       +4     
============================================
  Files           388      388              
  Lines         12228    12234       +6     
  Branches       1209     1209              
============================================
+ Hits           6151     6161      +10     
+ Misses         5712     5708       -4     
  Partials        365      365              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@kalavt
Copy link
Author

kalavt commented Aug 29, 2024

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

@kalavt kalavt closed this Aug 29, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 29, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant