Skip to content

Conversation

@junrushao
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @junrushao, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces extensive new documentation for TVM-FFI's function and module system, providing a detailed guide on how to define, register, and call functions across different languages using a stable C ABI. It also clarifies the role of modules in dynamic loading and namespace isolation. Complementing these documentation efforts, a functional enhancement allows Python callables to be directly wrapped into FFI functions, streamlining integration and aligning with the newly documented workflows.

Highlights

  • New Documentation for Functions and Modules: A comprehensive new documentation page, docs/concepts/func_module.rst, has been added. This page details the TVM-FFI function and module system, covering ABI-stable cross-language function calls, global function registration, module usage, and the stable C calling convention.
  • Enhanced Python Function Wrapping: The Python tvm_ffi.Function class now supports direct initialization with a Python callable, simplifying the process of wrapping Python functions for use within the TVM-FFI system. This change is reflected in python/tvm_ffi/cython/function.pxi and its type stub.
  • Documentation Cross-Referencing: Existing documentation files, including docs/concepts/any.rst and docs/concepts/object_and_class.rst, have been updated to include cross-references to the new function and module documentation, improving navigability and information discovery.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new documentation page for TVM-FFI functions and modules, which is a great addition for users. It also includes related updates to link to this new page from other documents and adds a constructor to the Python tvm_ffi.Function class to allow wrapping callables directly.

My review focuses on improving the clarity and correctness of the new documentation and the associated code changes. I've pointed out a few inconsistencies in code examples and docstrings that could confuse users. Overall, the changes are valuable and with a few adjustments, the documentation will be even better.

@junrushao junrushao force-pushed the 2026-01-09/doc-func branch from 2d6d54f to 351e05e Compare January 10, 2026 08:58
@junrushao junrushao marked this pull request as ready for review January 10, 2026 08:59
@junrushao junrushao force-pushed the 2026-01-09/doc-func branch from 351e05e to a953de4 Compare January 10, 2026 17:36
@junrushao junrushao changed the title doc: Function and Module doc: Function, Exception and Module Jan 10, 2026
@junrushao junrushao force-pushed the 2026-01-09/doc-func branch 2 times, most recently from 2631de1 to a057933 Compare January 11, 2026 00:04
@junrushao
Copy link
Member Author

/gemini review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces comprehensive documentation for TVM-FFI's Function, Exception, and Module systems by adding a new page, docs/concepts/func_module.rst. The new documentation is well-structured, providing clear explanations and useful code examples. The changes also include updates to other documentation files to integrate this new content. My review identified a couple of minor issues in the code examples within the new documentation, specifically a missing semicolon and some inconsistent indentation, which could be improved for correctness and clarity. Overall, this is a valuable addition to the project's documentation.

@junrushao junrushao force-pushed the 2026-01-09/doc-func branch from a057933 to 5b97918 Compare January 11, 2026 00:08
@junrushao
Copy link
Member Author

@tqchen I made some updates accordingly. Could you please re-review?

@junrushao junrushao merged commit f173692 into apache:main Jan 11, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants