Skip to content

Use Iceberg-Rust for parsing the ManifestList and Manifests #2004

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 15 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Fokko
Copy link
Contributor

@Fokko Fokko commented May 14, 2025

Rationale for this change

This replaces the Cython implementation for reading Avro with Iceberg-Rust. This would greatly simplify the PyIceberg project since we don't have to publish Python wheels anymore.

Are these changes tested?

Are there any user-facing changes?

@Fokko Fokko changed the title Fd rust Use Iceberg-Rust for parsing the ManifestList and Manifests May 15, 2025
@Fokko
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fokko commented Jun 26, 2025

@roeap Thanks, your patch fixed correctly passing through the 102: partition field 🥳

Copy link
Contributor

@kevinjqliu kevinjqliu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks like we're waiting for apache/iceberg-rust#1328 to finalize, which is dependent on apache/iceberg-rust#1482 :)

@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ def test_write_empty_manifest() -> None:

@pytest.mark.parametrize("format_version", [1, 2])
def test_write_manifest(
generated_manifest_file_file_v1: str, generated_manifest_file_file_v2: str, format_version: TableVersion
generated_manifest_file_file_v1: str, generated_manifest_file_file_v2: str, format_version: TableVersion, test_schema: Schema
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit use test_partition_spec too

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants