Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HBASE-28253: HBCK2 filesystem command to fix version file fails when Master in not up. #139

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

robin7roy
Copy link

Removed the check for HBCK support in the filesystem command as it causes issues while trying to run command filesystem -f which doesn't need master to be up. Filesystem checks are all offline and doesn't need the master.

…Master in not up.

Removed the check for HBCK support in the filesystem command as it causes issues while trying to run command filesystem -f which doesn't need master to be up.
Filesystem checks are all offline and doesn't need the master.
@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 1m 13s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 spotbugs 0m 0s spotbugs executables are not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-0 ⚠️ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ master Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 0m 47s master passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 10s master passed
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 8s master passed
+1 💚 spotless 0m 7s branch has no errors when running spotless:check.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 8s master passed
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 0m 12s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 10s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 0m 10s the patch passed
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 4s the patch passed
+1 💚 whitespace 0m 0s The patch has no whitespace issues.
+1 💚 spotless 0m 5s patch has no errors when running spotless:check.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 5s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 4m 44s hbase-hbck2 in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 7s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
8m 10s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.43 ServerAPI=1.43 base: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Operator-Tools-PreCommit/job/PR-139/1/artifact/yetus-precommit-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #139
JIRA Issue HBASE-28253
Optional Tests dupname asflicense javac javadoc unit spotbugs findbugs spotless checkstyle compile
uname Linux 8ee27dedfbb9 5.4.0-1103-aws #111~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 23 20:04:10 UTC 2023 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/jenkins/hbase-personality.sh
git revision master / 4d4c928
Default Java Oracle Corporation-1.8.0_342-b07
Test Results https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Operator-Tools-PreCommit/job/PR-139/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 1289 (vs. ulimit of 5000)
modules C: hbase-hbck2 U: hbase-hbck2
Console output https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-Operator-Tools-PreCommit/job/PR-139/1/console
versions git=2.30.2 maven=3.8.6
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@anoopsjohn
Copy link

Any file system struct specific new stuff that we leverage in HBCK2 check/fix? I dont think so
Looks good +1

@robin7roy
Copy link
Author

Yeah no new stuff specific to HBCK2, we are still using the hbck1 codebase for filesystem checks

Any file system struct specific new stuff that we leverage in HBCK2 check/fix? I dont think so Looks good +1

Copy link
Contributor

@wchevreuil wchevreuil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's already a -s|--skip option in hbck2 for skipping the check (see here). I would rather modify checkHBCKSupport to mention this option in case of master connection failure.

@robin7roy
Copy link
Author

There's already a -s|--skip option in hbck2 for skipping the check (see here). I would rather modify checkHBCKSupport to mention this option in case of master connection failure.

Ohh missed this option, will make the needful changes in checkHBCKSupport

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants