HADOOP-19608. Upgrade to JUnit 5.13.3 + Surefire 3.5.3 #7785
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
|
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
|
aws failures (probably unrelated, given I'd not tested trunk yet) |
|
Surefire rejects me running without a named test |
steveloughran
force-pushed
the
build/HADOOP-19608-junit513
branch
from
a33729c to
ac5300c
Compare
that is a known issue some surefire upgrade maybe did that. We can put that in pom & get rid of this problem Looking at the previous build results, I think the Jenkins didn't run any test, we might need to touch something here & there to trigger all the tests |
|
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
* junit.jupiter and junit.vintage => 5.13.3 * junit.platform => 1.13.3 * Surefire => 3.5.3. Without that tests weren't being found. * cut a duplicate and conflicting import of mockito-jupiter; maven was warning of this.
steveloughran
force-pushed
the
build/HADOOP-19608-junit513
branch
from
ac5300c to
92484ab
Compare
steveloughran
changed the title
|
tested s3 london. lots of Itests failing, which will need fixing after. That test |
4 tasks
|
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
|
HDFS tests failing. Of the two classes run in my IDE
Assuming unrelated and cutting the hdfs test run trigger |
pan3793
reviewed
Jul 18, 2025
| <dependency> | ||
| <groupId>org.mockito</groupId> | ||
| <artifactId>mockito-junit-jupiter</artifactId> | ||
| <version>3.12.4</version> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is this change necessary? or just clean up unused dependency declarations
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I was getting a warning of a double reference, and while I was doing jupiter stuff, thought I should do this too
|
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Build property trimStackTrace is set to false.
This is restores the behavior that any test failure
includes a deep stack trace rather than the first two elements.
In this version of surefire it also seems to print the full stack
of JUnit test execution and the java runtime itself.
This is only an issue for when tests fail.
Build property surefire.failIfNoSpecifiedTests is set to false.
This is required to retain the behavior where the invocation
mvn verify -Dtest=unknown
will skip the unit tests but still run the integration tests, and a
specific property "it.test" can name the specific test to run:
mvn verify -Dtest=unknown -Dit.test=ITestConnection
steveloughran
force-pushed
the
build/HADOOP-19608-junit513
branch
from
c1d727a to
ffbf3b0
Compare
|
Last forced commit squashed all work and cut out the changes to trigger the hdfs and commons builds -just updates the project pom and adds dsocs. can I get this in ASAP, as it is needed for #7814 and any other PR trying to run fs contract tests parameterized. |
ayushtkn
approved these changes
Jul 23, 2025
ayushtkn
reviewed
Jul 23, 2025
| @@ -26,4 +26,5 @@ | |||
| <value>tests.fake-default.value</value> | |||
| <description>a default value for the "new" key of a deprecated pair.</description> | |||
| </property> | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i think this is some leftover? if so, do drop it before you commit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yeah, I missed that, and yes, its to be dropped. It'll force hadoop-common tests to run as the final safety check
|
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
slfan1989
approved these changes
Jul 24, 2025
|
@steveloughran LGTM. After #7814 is completed, I will proceed with fixing the parameterized test issues in other modules. |
4 tasks
|
@slfan1989 thanks, should be good soon, though miniyarn clusters aren't playing (think it's unrelated). And I know a lot more about JUnit 5, even though I think the team don't value developer's existing codebase or knowledge enough. Most unhappy about
At least our adoption of AssertJ was prescient. |
|
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
HADOOP-19608
How was this patch tested?
Worked on the iceberg bulk delete branch for its new parameterized test class.
Not yet tested anything else ... let's see what yetus says. I'll do the ITest run
For code changes:
LICENSE,LICENSE-binary,NOTICE-binaryfiles?