Consider Instance in Starting state for UserConcentratedPod

[sudo87]

Description

This PR adds count of Starting Instance for more realistic application of UserConcentratedPod. This change is similar to #11606

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[rajujith]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@rajujith a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 16.17%. Comparing base (eee43e5) to head (d54bf10).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on 4.20.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               4.20   #11845      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     16.17%   16.17%   -0.01%     
  Complexity    13300    13300              
============================================
  Files          5656     5656              
  Lines        498349   498349              
  Branches      60480    60480              
============================================
- Hits          80597    80595       -2     
- Misses       408778   408780       +2     
  Partials       8974     8974              

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	4.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests	17.02% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✖️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 15477

[weizhouapache]

@blueorangutan package

[weizhouapache]

code lgtm

[sudo87]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@sudo87 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✖️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 15481

[sudo87]

@blueorangutan test

[blueorangutan]

@sudo87 a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14700)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 57040 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr11845-t14700-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 140 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File
test_01_deployVMInSharedNetwork	Failure	345.71	test_network.py