-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
Management Server - Prepare for Maintenance and Cancel Maintenance improvements #10995
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Management Server - Prepare for Maintenance and Cancel Maintenance improvements #10995
Conversation
…provements: - Added new setting 'management.server.maintenance.ignore.maintenance.hosts' to ignore hosts in maintenance states while preparing management server for maintenance. This skips agent transfer and agents count check for hosts in maintenance. - Rebalance indirect agents after cancel maintenance, using rebalance parameter in cancelMaintenance API - Force maintenance after maintenance window timeout, using forced parameter in prepareForMaintenance API. - Propagate 'indirect.agent.lb.check.interval' setting change to the host agents.
e97cff3
to
835a5ab
Compare
@blueorangutan package |
@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #10995 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 16.57% 16.57% -0.01%
- Complexity 13870 13972 +102
============================================
Files 5719 5743 +24
Lines 507200 510648 +3448
Branches 61574 62105 +531
============================================
+ Hits 84093 84652 +559
- Misses 413688 416519 +2831
- Partials 9419 9477 +58
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13687 |
@blueorangutan test |
@sureshanaparti a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13488)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
code LGTM
@sureshanaparti I guess this is ready for review ? |
@blueorangutan package |
@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13856 |
…e code improvements
@blueorangutan package |
@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13900 |
c7387fd
to
718c283
Compare
@blueorangutan package |
@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13931 |
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13620)
|
…ng the indirect agent lb check background task
@blueorangutan package |
@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13955 |
@blueorangutan test |
@vladimirpetrov a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13643)
|
@blueorangutan test |
@vladimirpetrov a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13659)
|
Description
This PR has the following improvements for Management Server - Prepare for Maintenance and Cancel Maintenance.
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
Manually tested Prepare for Maintenance and Cancel Maintenance operations (with new setting, and API parameters) on Management Servers, in a Clustered environment with multiple Management Servers.
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?