Skip to content

Conversation

jbampton
Copy link
Member

Description

This PR...

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • build/CI
  • test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 28, 2024

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 14.63415% with 35 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 16.74%. Comparing base (83bccea) to head (2dd1710).
⚠️ Report is 207 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...cloud/storage/resource/VmwareStorageProcessor.java 0.00% 10 Missing ⚠️
...om/cloud/deploy/DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.java 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
...e/resource/StorageSubsystemCommandHandlerBase.java 0.00% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...ud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/KVMStorageProcessor.java 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
.../xenserver/resource/XenServerStorageProcessor.java 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...nserver/resource/Xenserver625StorageProcessor.java 50.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...n/java/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
.../CheckDataStoreStoragePolicyComplianceCommand.java 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...torage/allocator/AbstractStoragePoolAllocator.java 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...d/hypervisor/vmware/manager/VmwareManagerImpl.java 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
... and 6 more
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##              main   #10144       +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     3.89%   16.74%   +12.84%     
- Complexity       0    14063    +14063     
============================================
  Files          417     5724     +5307     
  Lines        33971   507787   +473816     
  Branches      6096    61734    +55638     
============================================
+ Hits          1324    85039    +83715     
- Misses       32489   413265   +380776     
- Partials       158     9483     +9325     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 3.89% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unittests 17.66% <14.63%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@jbampton jbampton closed this Dec 28, 2024
@jbampton jbampton reopened this Dec 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we could refuse a lot of those spellos but lgtm like this as well (non native ;)

@jbampton
Copy link
Member Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@jbampton a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 11930

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 11939

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2025

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@vishesh92 , lgty?

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13189

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan test

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13172)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 54043 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr10144-t13172-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 140 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
test_02_restore_vm_strict_tags_failure Failure 58.55 test_vm_strict_host_tags.py
test_02_scale_vm_strict_tags_failure Failure 58.74 test_vm_strict_host_tags.py
test_06_deploy_vm_on_any_host_with_strict_tags_failure Failure 5.71 test_vm_strict_host_tags.py

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@vishesh92 are all your concerns met?

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13674

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan test

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@vishesh92
Copy link
Member

@DaanHoogland @jbampton Since we are changing names of the Command classes, the requests might fail on agents until they are upgraded. IMO this requires some upgrade testing to ensure no issues occur during an upgrade. For a fresh install, there should be no issues.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13501)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 60771 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr10144-t13501-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 141 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File

Copy link

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

@jbampton jbampton force-pushed the pre-commit-update-codespell branch from 0c16198 to 53784f2 Compare July 24, 2025 10:44
Copy link
Member

@vishesh92 vishesh92 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

code lgtm

algoritm
allo
alloacate
allocted
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
allocted

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it has one occurance, we need to edit VpcManagerImpl line 2837 than as well. another PR?

Copy link

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants