Skip to content

Conversation

@rgrinberg
Copy link

As promised, the first step in the master plan :P

One thing I'm not sure about is what to do about the custom top level. Jbuilder
hasn't gained the ability to create those yet but it seems like it's not
essential to go ahead with this port.

@andrewray
Copy link
Owner

Thanks.

Regarding the toplevel - that is the actual iocaml-kernel so it will definitely be needed. It looks like jbuilder is about to get a bytecode only target ocaml/dune#104 along with which we'll probably need something along the lines of the expunge rule noted in the utop link in that issue.

@pveber
Copy link

pveber commented Oct 4, 2017

Is there something I can do to help push this PR forward?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants