-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
chore: reorder inject_into in RequestOption and fix title, description, and defaults in refresh_token_updater #635
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR reorders the inject_into
property in the RequestOption
schema to appear above field_name
, making the UI presentation more intuitive. It also removes a duplicate inject_into
block elsewhere in the definitions.
- Moved the
inject_into
block to be directly abovefield_name
in theRequestOption
definition. - Removed a redundant
inject_into
entry further down in the schema.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml:3421
- [nitpick] Consider adding a
default
value forinject_into
to maintain backward compatibility for consumers who don’t explicitly set it.
inject_into:
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml:3434
- Since UI behavior depends on this ordering, consider adding or updating a test to verify that
inject_into
now appears beforefield_name
in the generated schema.
field_name:
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe schema for the Changes
Would you like me to help draft a quick note for the changelog or PR description to highlight these clarifications and tidy-ups? Wdyt? 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
PyTest Results (Fast)1 127 tests - 2 558 1 116 ✅ - 2 558 4m 43s ⏱️ - 1m 34s For more details on these failures, see this check. Results for commit 842ccba. ± Comparison against base commit cc93e62. This pull request removes 2558 tests.
♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
PyTest Results (Full)3 688 tests ±0 3 676 ✅ - 1 17m 49s ⏱️ -10s For more details on these failures, see this check. Results for commit 842ccba. ± Comparison against base commit cc93e62. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
Inject Into should be above field name/path, as this makes more conceptual sense in the UI.
I also changed some of the titles, descriptions, and default values in refresh_token_updater to better match what the user should expect in the UI
Summary by CodeRabbit