Skip to content

Conversation

@jamesmckinna
Copy link
Contributor

Lifted out of #2863 for low-effort review and merging?

Copy link
Contributor

@JacquesCarette JacquesCarette left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a 90% approve, with picky feedback.

```agda
binomial-expansion : Associative _∙_ → _◦_ DistributesOver _∙_ →
∀ w x y z → ((w ∙ x) ◦ (y ∙ z)) ≡ ((((w ◦ y) ∙ (w ◦ z)) ∙ (x ◦ y)) ∙ (x ◦ z))
identity⇒central : Identity e _∙_ → Central _∙_ e
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why does this appear twice in the CHANGELOG?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@jamesmckinna jamesmckinna Nov 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps this is a misunderstanding on my part, but the separation of Algebra.Consequences into Base, Setoid, and Propositional, means that if we add a new lemma to (the API offered by) Setoid, then we also add a new lemma to the propositional API, so each one gets a CHANGELOG entry?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tangentially, hence #2874 ... which I stumbled over while writing this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants