-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 260
[ add ] Algebra.Definitions.Central plus Consequences for Identity and Zero
#2873
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
JacquesCarette
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a 90% approve, with picky feedback.
| ```agda | ||
| binomial-expansion : Associative _∙_ → _◦_ DistributesOver _∙_ → | ||
| ∀ w x y z → ((w ∙ x) ◦ (y ∙ z)) ≡ ((((w ◦ y) ∙ (w ◦ z)) ∙ (x ◦ y)) ∙ (x ◦ z)) | ||
| identity⇒central : Identity e _∙_ → Central _∙_ e |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why does this appear twice in the CHANGELOG?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps this is a misunderstanding on my part, but the separation of Algebra.Consequences into Base, Setoid, and Propositional, means that if we add a new lemma to (the API offered by) Setoid, then we also add a new lemma to the propositional API, so each one gets a CHANGELOG entry?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tangentially, hence #2874 ... which I stumbled over while writing this PR.
Co-authored-by: Jacques Carette <[email protected]>
Lifted out of #2863 for low-effort review and merging?