Skip to content

CI/CD: Cache server Docker image to speed up time for setting up server #743

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

juliannguyen4
Copy link
Collaborator

@juliannguyen4 juliannguyen4 commented Mar 20, 2025

Manual testing:

  • Build artifacts can reuse cache from the same branch
  • tests.yml can reuse cache from the same ref for PRs

TODO

  • Cache works for manylinux_x86_64 and macosx_arm64, but not manylinux_aarch64

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 20, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.71%. Comparing base (6ab075b) to head (e7570de).
Report is 2 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #743   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.71%   81.71%           
=======================================
  Files          98       98           
  Lines       14474    14474           
=======================================
  Hits        11827    11827           
  Misses       2647     2647           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ EXPOSE $TLS_PORT
FROM ubuntu:24.04 AS dos2unix

# Run our own set up steps after server finishes starting up
# Running WORKDIR on an existing directory causes WORKDIR instruction to not be cached
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bad comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants