Skip to content

[CLIENT-3246] Support "force_single_node" client config option for QE Jepsen testing #718

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

juliannguyen4
Copy link
Collaborator

@juliannguyen4 juliannguyen4 commented Jan 22, 2025

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 22, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.90909% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.72%. Comparing base (f978b29) to head (7a20518).
Report is 5 commits behind head on dev.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/main/client/type.c 90.90% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #718      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.71%   81.72%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          98       98              
  Lines       14474    14480       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits        11827    11834       +7     
+ Misses       2647     2646       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@juliannguyen4 juliannguyen4 changed the title [CLIENT-3246] Support "force_single_node" client config option for Jepsen testing [CLIENT-3246] Support "force_single_node" client config option for QE Jepsen testing Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants