Skip to content

Conversation

@eschultink
Copy link
Member

Features

  • support multiple connectors of same source kind, leveraging the specs as "templates"

TODO:

  • solution for cases such as salesforce_domain, which if you want mutliple salesforce instances, you'd need to pass in multiple times to create the "templates"; as it stands, multiple salesforce connector usages via templates will end up with the same salesforce domain.

Change implications

  • dependencies added/changed? no
  • something important to note in future release notes? no

@eschultink eschultink self-assigned this Sep 10, 2025
variable "enabled_connectors_from_templates" {
type = map(object({
template_id = string
}))
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. alter connector "specs" to be more like true templates, and have each evaluated in isolation with a "scope" that's the content of this object??
  • problem with that is that I believe Terraform erases/hides object properties not explicitly in variables definition of the module; so we can't have arbitrary content.
  • might also make module structure pretty complicated, with connectors being invoked repeatedly
  1. have a map(string) that is "merged" over top whatever the spec for the template has by default?
    • not sure this is enough
    • undermines value, bc in several cases you won't re-use that much of the template and will have to re-write a bunch of it.
  2. explicit set of properties that can be overridden; target_host, environment_variables, settings_to_provide, and rules_file probably enough ...
    • example_api_requests will remain problematic.

Base automatically changed from s207-custom-api-connectors to rc-v0.5.9 September 11, 2025 18:04
Base automatically changed from rc-v0.5.9 to main September 12, 2025 19:46
@eschultink eschultink changed the base branch from main to rc-v0.5.10 September 15, 2025 17:28
@eschultink eschultink deleted the branch rc-v0.5.14 October 2, 2025 16:04
@eschultink eschultink closed this Oct 2, 2025
@eschultink eschultink reopened this Oct 2, 2025
Base automatically changed from rc-v0.5.10 to main October 8, 2025 08:41
@eschultink eschultink changed the base branch from main to rc-v0.5.11 October 8, 2025 18:31
Base automatically changed from rc-v0.5.11 to main October 28, 2025 18:08
@eschultink eschultink changed the base branch from main to rc-v0.5.12 October 28, 2025 21:33
Base automatically changed from rc-v0.5.12 to main November 12, 2025 16:19
@eschultink eschultink changed the base branch from main to rc-v0.5.13 November 12, 2025 19:21
Base automatically changed from rc-v0.5.13 to main November 17, 2025 18:49
@eschultink eschultink changed the base branch from main to rc-v0.5.14 November 17, 2025 20:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants