Feature: Added $ChatNotebookEvaluation and fixed some other minor misc issues
#578
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…rating one from the base name
…s have been removed from the chat output cell
…n order to avoid large notebook sizes
…de to determine if the tool is being used in a chat notebook or programmatically
This was referenced Aug 21, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added
$ChatNotebookEvaluation, which givesTruewhen in a chat notebook evaluation andFalseotherwise. This lets you define alternate tool behavior forLLMTool, personas, etc depending on whether or not evaluation is happening in a chat notebook or programmatically.For example, define an LLMTool that does something different in a chat notebook environment: