Skip to content

Conversation

gesa
Copy link
Contributor

@gesa gesa commented Oct 12, 2025

These changes are an editorial suggestion, I encourage the editor(s) to implement whichever ones they feel are appropriate.

These changes are an editorial suggestion, I encourage the editor(s) to implement whichever ones they feel are appropriate.
The exact type of the global scope (`globalThis`) can vary across runtimes. Most Web Platform APIs are defined in terms that assume Web Browser environments that specifically expose types like {{Window}}, {{WorkerGlobalScope}}, and so forth. To simplify conformance, all interfaces, methods, and properties defined by the present document shall be exposed on the runtime's relevant global scope (e.g., `globalThis.crypto`, `globalThis.ReadableStream`, etc).

With many runtimes, adding a new global-scoped property can introduce breaking changes when the new global conflicts with existing application code. Many Web Platform APIs define global properties using [=read only|the `readonly` attribute=]. [[!WEBIDL]] To avoid introducing breaking changes, runtimes conforming to this specification may choose to ignore the `readonly` attribute for properties being added to the global scope. This allows users of these runtimes to delete or overwrite these properties if they conflict with existing application code.
With many runtimes, adding a new global-scoped property can introduce breaking changes when the new global conflicts with existing application code. Many Web Platform APIs define global properties using [=read only|the `readonly` attribute=]. [[!WEBIDL]] To avoid introducing breaking changes, runtimes conforming to the Minimum commone web API standard may choose to ignore the `readonly` attribute for properties being added to the global scope. This allows users of these runtimes to delete or overwrite these properties if they conflict with existing application code.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
With many runtimes, adding a new global-scoped property can introduce breaking changes when the new global conflicts with existing application code. Many Web Platform APIs define global properties using [=read only|the `readonly` attribute=]. [[!WEBIDL]] To avoid introducing breaking changes, runtimes conforming to the Minimum commone web API standard may choose to ignore the `readonly` attribute for properties being added to the global scope. This allows users of these runtimes to delete or overwrite these properties if they conflict with existing application code.
With many runtimes, adding a new global-scoped property can introduce breaking changes when the new global conflicts with existing application code. Many Web Platform APIs define global properties using [=read only|the `readonly` attribute=]. [[!WEBIDL]] To avoid introducing breaking changes, runtimes conforming to the Minimum common web API standard may choose to ignore the `readonly` attribute for properties being added to the global scope. This allows users of these runtimes to delete or overwrite these properties if they conflict with existing application code.

Runtime-specific extensions to any Web Platform API may be implemented by conforming runtimes. Such extensions shall be defined so that their use neither contradicts, nor causes the non-conformance of, normative functionality of any Web Platform API. It is important to carefully consider use of such extensions, as it reduces interoperability and portability of code across runtimes.

This specification does not prohibit implementing additional Web Platform APIs beyond those listed here.
The present dsocument does not prohibit implementing additional Web Platform APIs beyond those listed here.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
The present dsocument does not prohibit implementing additional Web Platform APIs beyond those listed here.
The present document does not prohibit implementing additional Web Platform APIs beyond those listed here.

But since code running in web browsers makes up the vast majority of JavaScript code, this is helped along if such runtimes support the same APIs as web browsers. So, unsurprisingly, more and more runtime environments have started supporting web platform APIs. However, the increase in such environments, as well as the different choices of web platform APIs, resulted in poor interoperability across such environments.

As such, this Ecma Standard defines the Minimum Common Web API specification, which lists a curated minimum subset of web platform APIs for server-side and edge runtimes to implement if they aim to be web-interoperable. This is the first edition of the standard, corresponding to the 2025 snapshot, and an additional snapshot will be published every year.
As such, this Ecma Standard defines the Minimum Common Web API specification, which lists a curated minimum subset of web platform APIs for server-side and edge runtimes to implement if they aim to be web-interoperable. This is the first edition of the standard, corresponding to the 2025 snapshot. An additional snapshot is intended to be published annually.
Copy link
Member

@andreubotella andreubotella Oct 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the MCA version submitted to the ExeCom, you made a number of editorial changes to the intro and scope, which we should probably incorporate into this version as well; but here both changes would conflict. The ExeCom draft has instead:

As the web platform (and non-web runtimes) grow and evolve, the committee will aim to publish with an annual cadence.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ahh, thank you for that reminder. I'm gonna push a new commit that aligns with the published edition

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants